The Righteous Mind: Jonathan Haidt in Search for the Moral Foundations of Politics
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-4-279-312
EDN: ZFDWVM
Abstract
The article provides an extended critical review of the key arguments of the book “Righteous Mind" by Jonhatan Haidt and an analysis of the intellectual context in which his influential theory of moral foundations (MFT) had emerged. Authors reconstruct Haidt’s intention of reinterpreting and possibly overcoming the ever growing “culture wars" in American society - the difference between liberals and conservatives in their understanding of what constitutes the basic set of moral foundations. The opposition between intuitionist (Hume) and rationalistic (Kant) approaches to morality in social psychology is considered, followed by the discussion of the complex relationship between biological, evolutionist and sociocultural mechanisms according to Haidt, as well as his original revision of the theory of “homo duplex” by Emile Durkheim, who understood collective identity in terms of the sacred bonds. In the final part of the article authors show that the most vulnerable arguments of Haidt are not those related to the “biological reductionism” often erroneously attributed to the American thinker, but issues related to the insufficient elaboration of the criteria of the identification of the five or six specific foundations, and to self-contradictory character of the strategic move of the book: Haidt tries to extend the too narrow spectrum of the moral foundations of his liberal colleagues and compatriots by the force of his rational arguments, but at the same time he shows that moral reactions are rather intuitive and not rational by nature.
About the Authors
Timur Atnashev
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav Kalinin
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Abbot, P., et al. (2011) “Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality”, Nature 471 (7339): E1–E4.
2. Atari M., Graham J., Dehghani M. (2020) “Foundations of morality in Iran”, Evolution and Human Behavior 41.
3. Bayrak, F., Alper, S. (2021) “A tale of two hashtags: An examination of moral content of pro- and anti-government tweets in Turkey”, European Journal of Social Psychology 51(3): 585–596.
4. Curry, O., Chesters, M., Lissa, А. (2019) “Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire”, Journal of Research in Personality 78: 106–124.
5. Dawkins, R. (1994) “Burying the Vehicle [Commentary on Wilson & Sober: Reintroducing Group Selection to Human Behavioral Sciences]”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17(4): 616–617.
6. Diurkgeim, E. (2013) “Dualizm chelovecheskoi prirody i ego sotsial’nye usloviia” [The dualism of human nature and its social conditions], Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie 12(2): 133–144.
7. Diurkgeim, E. (2018) Elementarnye formy religioznoi zhizni: totemicheskaia sistema v Avstralii [Elementary forms of religious life: the totemic system in Australia]. M.: Izdatel’skii dom “Delo” RANKhiGS.
8. Duglas, M. (2000) Chistota i opasnost’: Analiz predstavlenii ob oskvernenii i tabu [Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Perceptions of Defilement and Taboo]. M.: KANON-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole.
9. Graham, J., et. al. (2013) “Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism”, in P. Devine, A. Plant (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 47, pp. 55–130. Burlington: Academic Press.
10. Haidt, J. (2001) “The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment”, Psychological Review 108(4): 814–834.
11. Haidt, J. (2008) “What makes people vote republican?”, Edge [https://www.edge.org/conversation/jonathan_haidt-what-makes-people-vote-republican.html, accessed on 17.10.2021].
12. Haidt, J. (2012) The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, pp. 133–134. Pantheon Books.
13. Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F. (2007) “Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality”, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) Moral psychology, vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality, pp. 181–217. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
14. Haidt, J., Joseph, C. (2004) “Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues”, Daedalus (Fall): 55–66.
15. Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., Dias, M. G. (1993) “Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(4): 613–628.
16. Harper, C.A., Rhodes, D. (2021) “Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire”, British Journal of Social Psychology 60(4):1303–1329.
17. Hunter, J.D. (1991) Culture Wars: The Struggle to Control the Family, Art, Education, Law, and Politics in America. New York: Basic Press.
18. Iudin, G. (2013) “Kollektivnoe i individual’noe v filosofskoi antropologii E. Diurkgeima” [The Collective and the Individual in the Philosophical Anthropology of E. Durkheim], Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie 12(2): 122–132.
19. Ium, D. (1996) Sochineniia v 2 t. T. I [Essays in two volumes. Vol. 1]. M.: Mysl’.
20. Jost, J.T. (2012) “Review: Left and Right, Right and Wrong”, Science, New Series 337(6094): 525–526.
21. Kivikangas, J.M., et. al. (2021) “Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis”, Psychological Bulletin 147(1): 55–94.
22. Koleva, S.P., et. al. (2012) “Tracing the threads: how five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes”, Journal of Research in Personality 46: 184–194.
23. Kozlova, M.A., Kozlov, A.I. (2016) “Istoki morali, orientirovannoi na individa i gruppu: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii i estestvenno-nauchnyi aspekty” [The origins of individual- and group-oriented morality: socio-psychological and natural-scientific aspects], Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 37(3): 60–70.
24. Kugler, M., Jost, J.T., Noorbaloochi, S. (2014) “Another look at moral foundations theory: do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions?”, Social Justice Research 27: 413–431.
25. Mossop, B. (2012) “Moral Mayhem”, Scientific American Mind 22(6): 69.
26. Nagel, T. (2012) “The Taste for Being Moral”, New York Review of Books [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2012/12/06/taste-being-moral/?pagination=false#.UVHGZi5czCI.wordpress.html, accessed on 17.10.2021].
27. Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A. (2015) “The Moral Foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden”, Personality and Individual Differences 76: 28–32.
28. Shackelford, T.K., Hansen, R.D. (eds) (2016) The Evolution of Morality. Springer.
29. Shweder R.A., Much N.C., Mahapatra M., Park L. (1997) “The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering”, in A. M. Brandt, P. Rozin (eds) Morality and health. New York, pp. 119–169. NY: Routledge.
30. Shweder, R.A. (1991) Thinking through Cultures: Expeditions in Cultural Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Shweder, R.A., Haidt, J. (2000) “The Cultural Psychology of Emotions: Ancient and New”, in M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds) Handbook of Emotions (2nd ed.), pp. 379–414. New York: Guilford Press.
32. Smith, I. H., Aquino, K., Koleva, S., Graham, J. (2014) “The moral ties that bind…even to out-groups: the interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations”, Psychological Science 25: 1554–1562.
33. Sychev O., Protasova I., Belousov K. (2018) “Diagnostika moral’nykh osnovanii: aprobatsiia russkoiazychnoi versii oprosnika MFQ” [Diagnosing Moral Foundations: Approbation of the Russian version of the MFQ questionnaire], Rossiiskii Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal 15(3): 88–115.
34. Sychev O. A., Bespalov A. M., Prudnikova M. M., Vlasov M. S. (2016) “Osobennosti moral’nykh osnovanii u mongol’skikh, nemetskikh i rossiiskikh podrostkov” [Features of Moral Foundations in Mongolian, German and Russian Adolescents], Kul’turno-istoricheskaia psikhologiia 12(1): 85–96.
35. Uzlaner, D. (2020) “Rossiia v transnatsional’nykh kul’turnykh voinakh. Chast’ 1” [Russia in transnational culture wars. Part 1], Neprikosnovennyi zapas 3(131): 100–120.
36. Uzlaner, D. (2020) “Rossiia v transnatsional’nykh kul’turnykh voinakh. Chast’ 2” [Russia
37. in transnational culture wars. Part 2], Neprikosnovennyi Zapas 4(132): 158–184.
38. Vaisey, S. (2012) “The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt”, European Journal of Sociology /Archives Européennes de Sociologie/Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie 53(3): 448–451.
39. Zaikin, V.A. (2017) “Moral’noe funktsionirovanie: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii podkhod.
40. Sotsial’no-intuitivistskaia teoriia Dzh. Khaidta” [Moral functioning: a socio-psychological approach. Socio-intuitive theory of J. Haidt], Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal 1(25): 32–38.
Review
For citations:
Atnashev T., Kalinin V. The Righteous Mind: Jonathan Haidt in Search for the Moral Foundations of Politics. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2021;39(4):279-312. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-4-279-312. EDN: ZFDWVM
Views:
36
Email this article 