The Phenomenon of Evil in the Atheistic Discourse: The Illusion of Heuristic Advantage
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-4-XX-XX
EDN: IZKGUU
Abstract
The author considers the argument formulated by a number of modern philosophers (G. Oppy, P. Draper) that atheism has a certain heuristic advantage in explaining the phenomenon of evil, which in discussions between theism and naturalism allows us to justify the rational choice of a theoretical position in favor of naturalism. The author admits the peripheral nature of the problem of evil in non-the-istic thinking, while he shows a major trend in current philosophy to conceptualize the problem of evil within the framework of secular thinking. The author indicates a process underway of forming of a separate subject area, a kind of secular “evil studies,” the potential and productivity of which is too early to assess. The paper then explores the assumption that the description of the mechanics of work of evil can be identical with its explanation. The opinion that evil is exclusively problematized in theistic thinking is but a result of a certain inertia of the intellectual history. In fact, the problem of evil is one of the vulnerable points within atheistic (and, broadly, secular) discourse, which downplays the alleged heuristic advantage of atheism.
About the Author
Vladimir Sidorin
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of History of Russian Philosophy
References
1. Булгаков С.Н. Иван Карамазов (в романе Достоевского "Братья Карамазовы") как философский тип // Вопросы философии и психологии. 1902. Кн. 1(61). С. 826863.
2. Луначарский А.В. Русский Фауст // Этюды критические и полемические. М.: Правда, 1905. С. 179-190.
3. Юм Д. Диалоги о естественной религии // Сочинения в 2 тт. Т. 2. М.: Мысль, 1996.C. 379-482.
4. Bernstein, R. J. (2002) Radical Evil: A Philosophical Interrogation. Cambridge, Maldon: Polity Press.
5. Brink, D. O. (2007) "The Autonomy of Ethics", in M. Martin (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, pp. 149-165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Card, C. (2002) The Atrocity Paradigm. A Theory of Evil. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Churchland, P. (2019) Conscience. The Origin of Moral Intuition. NY, London: W. W. Norton & Company.
8. Clendinnen, J. (1999) Reading the Holocaust. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cole, P. (2006) The Myth of Evil. Demonizing the Enemy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
10. Draper, P., Dougherty, T. (2013) "Explanation and the Problem of Evil", in J. P. McBrayer,D. Howard-Snyder (eds) The Blackwell Companion to The Problem of Evil, pp. 6782. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
11. Draper, P. (2017) "God, Evil and the Nature of Light", in C. Mester, P. Moser (eds) The Cambridge Companion to the Problem of Evil, pp. 65-84. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Eagleton, T. (2010) On Evil. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
13. Hickson, M. (2013) "A Brief History of Problems of Evil", in J. P. McBrayer, D. Howard-Snyder (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to The Problem of Evil, pp. 3-19. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
14. Hume, D. (1996) "Dialogi o estestvennoi religii" [Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion], in Sochineniya v 2 tt. T. 2, pp. 379-482. Moscow: Mysl'.
15. Jameson, F. (1979) Fables of Aggression: Wyndham Lewis, the Modernist as Fascist. Berkeley etc.: University of California Press.
16. Kekes, J. (2005) The Roots of Evil. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
17. Koterski, J. W., Oppy, G. (eds) (2019) Theism and Atheism. Opposing Arguments in Philosophy. Boston: Cengage.
18. Martin, M. (2003) Atheism, Morality and Meaning. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Book.
19. Martin, M. (ed.) (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Meister, C., Moser, P. K. (eds) (2017) The Cambridge Companion to the Problem of Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Neiman, S. (2015) Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy. 2nd ed. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
22. Oppy, G. (2019) Atheism. The Basics. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
23. Oppy, G. (2013) "Rowe's Evidential Arguments from Evil", in J. P. McBrayer, D. Howard-Snyder (eds) The Blackwell Companion to The Problem of Evil, pp. 49-66. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
24. Oppy, G. (2013) The Best Argument Against God. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Russel, L. (2014) Evil: A Philosophical Investigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Sapolsky, R. (2017) Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. New York: Penguin Press.
27. Tropman, E (2019) "Meta-Ethics", in G. Oppy (ed.) A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy, pp. 343-354. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
28. Waal de, F., Churchland, P., Pievani, T., Parmigiani, S. (2014) Evolved Morality: The Biology and Philosophy of Human Conscience. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Review
For citations:
Sidorin V. The Phenomenon of Evil in the Atheistic Discourse: The Illusion of Heuristic Advantage. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2021;39(4):92-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-4-XX-XX. EDN: IZKGUU
Views:
26
Email this article 