Appealing to History as a Method of Islamic Reformation: Mardjani, Rashid Rida, and Ibn Khaldun
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2023-41-3-4-32-54
Abstract
The paper looks at the perception of history in the discourse of two modern Islamic reformers — Shihab adDin Mardjani and Muhammad Rashid Rida — through an analysis of how both authors used the ideas and texts of the first Muslim history theorist Ibn Khaldun. The author concludes that the historical argument is deeply rooted in Islamic thought as a selfrenewing tradition (tadjdid), which in different periods of time refreshes an authentic Islamic spirit liberating it from “illegal innovations” (bid’a) and thus preserving its purity. The appeal to rational and critical historical knowledge enabled reformers to deconstruct a history of Muslims and revise historical memory, which is similar to the revision of Islamic law through idjtihad. The logic of the historical argument provided Muslim authors with a general conceptual base and a common language for discussions with European Orientalists. Islamic modernists defended historical subjectivity of Islam and its progressive role in the history of human civilization. The language of academic history enabled them to criticize the real history of Muslim peoples and Islam as a religious system. Hence comes the argument of in favor of reforms — literally “corrections” (islah) based on the primordial historical essence of Islam as they viewed it. Appeal to Ibn Khaldun allows Muslim reformers to discover an authentic source of historical rationalism that helped them adapt Western scientific ideas in the Islamic context. Yet, in interaction with these ideas, they developed their own new conceptual apparatus. The historical and sociological theory of Ibn Khaldun was the link with which European science could be connected to the Islamic historical tradition. A new understanding of history was based on the same idjtihad method. In this light, the categories of “progress” and “development” were naturally described as a return to the initial tradition, and thus modernism inevitably worked as a discursive form of fundamentalism.
About the Author
I. Alexeev
Russian State University for the Humanities;
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor Alexeev — Associated Professor
Moscow
References
1. Алексеев И.Л. Сырейщикова А.А. Некоторые тенденции изучения наследия Ибн Халдуна в современной историографии//Вестник РГГУ. Серия: Политология. История. Международные отношения. 2009. № 13. С. 195–218.
2. Алексеев И.Л. История как исламская наука: Марджани и Ибн Халдун// Islamology. 2019. Т. 9. № 1–2. С. 24–33.
3. Бессмертная О.Ю. Понимание истории и идентичность автора в возражениях Атауллы Баязитова Эрнесту Ренану // Islamology. 2019. Т. 9. № 1–2. С. 55–82.
4. Ибн Халдун. Введение в историю (ал-Мукаддима). Фрагменты. Перевод с арабского, комментарии и примечания И.Л. Алексеева, А.В. Душак и А.Ш. Столыпинской//Pax Islamica. 2008. Т. 1. № 1. С. 15–32.
5. Ибн Халдун. Мукаддимат Ибн Халдун. Тахкик ад-дуктур Хисам Ахмад ат-Тахир. ал-Кахира: Дар ал-Фаджр ли-т-турас, 2004.
6. Кемпер М. Суфии и ученые в Татарстане и Башкортостане: исламский дискурс под русским господством. Казань: Российский исламский ун-т, 2008.
7. Китаб мухаварат ал-муслих ва-л-мукаллид ва-л-вахда ал-исламийа би калам ас-саййид Мухаммад Рашид Рида мунши’ маджаллат ал-Манар. Миср: Матба‘атМаджаллат ал-Манар ал-Исламийа, 1324 (=Книга диалогов реформатора и традиционалиста и исламское единство Мухаммада Рашида Риды, основателя журнала ал-Манар). Каир, 1324 (=1906).
8. Марданова Д.З. Полемика как механизм поиска и утверждения истины (на примере полемики в вопросах ‘акиды между Шигабутдином Марджани и его оппонентами в Поволжье в последней трети XIX в.) //Вестник РУДН. История России. 2018. № 3. C. 513–537.
9. Марджани Шигабутдин. Введение к биобиблиографическому словарю «Верность предшественникам и приветствие потомкам» /Российский исламский институт; Институт истории им. Ш. Марджани АН РТ; пер. на рус. со старотатар., араб. и сост. науч. коммент. Р.А. Гиззатуллина, А.М. Салахова, авт. предисл. Д.А. Шагавиев. Казань: Магариф-Вакыт, 2022.
10. Марджани, Шихаб адДин. Китаб вафийат ал-аслаф ва тахийат ал-ахлаф. Казань, 1883.
11. Насыров И.Р. «Ибн-халдунизм» в османской интеллектуальной традиции (XVI–XX вв.) //Философский журнал. 2016. Т. 9. № 3. С. 106–120.
12. Насыров И.Р. Ибн Халдун в османской историографии. Москва: Садра, 2022.
13. Рида, Мухаммад Рашид. Мухаварат ал-муслих ва-л-мукаллид. Каир: Дар ан-нашр л-лджами’ат/Миннеаполис: Дар ал-Манар, 1429/2008.
14. Шагавиев Д. Шигабутдин Марджани как суфий // Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2008. № 1(1). C. 35–46.
15. Юзеев А. Н. Мировоззрение Ш. Марджани и арабо-мусульманская философия. Казань, 1992.
16. Юзеев А. Н. Татарская философская мысль конца XVIII–XIX веков: эволюция, основные направления и представители. Казань: Иман, 1998.
17. Alekseev, I.L. (2019) “Istoriia kak islamskaia nauka: Mardzhani i Ibn Khaldun” [History as an Islamic science: Marjani and Ibn Khaldun], Islamology 9(1–2): 24–33.
18. Alekseev, I.L., Syreishchikova A.A. (2009) “Nekotorye tendentsii izucheniia naslediia Ibn Khalduna v sovremennoi istoriografii” [Some trends in the study of Ibn Khaldun’ s legacy in modern historiography], Vestnik RGGU. Seriia: Politologiia. Istoriia. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia 13: 195–218.
19. Bessmertnaia, O. Iu. (2019) “Ponimanie istorii i identichnost’ avtora v vozrazheniiakh Ataully Baiazitova Ėrnestu Renanu” [Understanding of history and identity of the author in Ataulla Bayazitov’ s objections to Ernest Renan], Islamology 9(1– 2): 55– 82.
20. De Blois, F.C., et al. “Ta’ rīk̲h̲”, Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, ed. by P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs, pp. 52–53 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_1184, accessed on 15 May 2023].
21. Ibn Khaldun (2008) “Vvedenie v istoriiu (al-Mukaddima). Fragmenty” [Introduction to History (al-Muqaddima). Fragments]. Perevod s arabskogo, kommentarii i primechaniia I.L. Alekseeva, A.V. Dushak i A. Sh. Stolypinskoi, Pax Islamica 1(1): 15–32.
22. Ibn Khaldun (2004) Mukaddimat Ibn Khaldun. Tahqiq ad-duktur Hisam Ahmad at-Tahir. al-Qahira: Dar al-Fadjr li-t-turath.
23. Kemper, M. (2008) Sufii i uchenye v Tatarstane i Bashkortostane : islamskii diskurs pod russkim gospodstvom [Sufis and scholars in Tatarstan and Bashkortostan: Islamic discourse under Russian domination]. Kazan’: Rossiiskii islamskii un-t.
24. Kitab muhawarat almuslih walmuqallid walwahda alislamiyya bi kalam assayyid Muhammad Rashid Rida munshi’ madjallat alManar. Misr: Matba’at Madjallat al-Manar al-Islamiyya, 1324. Al-Qahira, 1324 (=1906).
25. Kurzman, Ch. (ed.) (2002) Modernist Islam, 1840–1940: A Sourcebook. Oxford University Press, USA.
26. Mardanova, D.Z. (2018) “Polemika kak mekhanizm poiska i utverzhdeniia istiny (na primere polemiki v voprosakh ‘akidy mezhdu Shigabutdinom Mardzhani i ego opponentami v Povolzh’ e v poslednei treti XIX v.)” [Polemics as a mechanism of search and
27. affirmation of truth (on the example of polemics in the issues of ’aqeedah between Shigabutdin Marjani and his opponents in the Volga region in the last third of the 19th century)], Vestnik RUDN. Istoriia Rossii 3: 513–537.
28. Mardzhani, Shigabutdin (2022) “Vvedenie k biobibliograficheskomu slovariu ‘Vernost’ predshestvennikam i privetstvie potomkam’” [Introduction to the biobibliographical dictionary “Fidelity to predecessors and greetings to descendants”] / Rossiiskii islamskii institut ; Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT; per. na rus. so starotatar., arab. i sost. nauch. komment. R.A. Gizzatullina, A. M. Salakhova , avt. predisl. D.A. Shagaviev. Kazan’: Magarif-Vakyt.
29. Mardjani, Shihab ad-Din. (1883) Kitab wafiyat alaslaf va tahiyat alahlaf. Kazan.
30. Nasyrov, I. R. (2016) “‘Ibn-khaldunizm’ v osmanskoi intellektual’ noi traditsii (XVI–XX vv.)” [“Ibn Khaldunism” in the Ottoman intellectual tradition (XVI–XX centuries)], Filosofskii zhurnal 9(3): 106–120.
31. Nasyrov, I. R. (2022) Ibn Khaldun v osmanskoi istoriografii [Ibn Khaldun in Ottoman historiography]. Moskva: Sadra.
32. Rida, Muhammad Rashid (1429/2008) Muhavarat almuslih walmuqallid. Al-Qahira: Dar an-nashr l-l-djami’at /Minneapolis: Dar al-Manar.
33. Shagaviev, D. (2008) “Shigabutdin Mardzhani kak sufii” [Shigabutdin Mardzhani as Sufi], Minbar. Islamic Studies 1(1): 35–46.
34. Ringer, M.M. (2020) Islamic Modernism and the Reenchantment of the Sacred in the Age of History. Edinburgh University Press.
35. Rosenthal, F. (1968) A History of Muslim Historiography. E. J. Brill.
Review
For citations:
Alexeev I. Appealing to History as a Method of Islamic Reformation: Mardjani, Rashid Rida, and Ibn Khaldun. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2023;41(3-4):32-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2023-41-3-4-32-54
Views:
96
Email this article 