Ethical Dilemmas of Surrogacy: Christian Discourse in Contemporary Socio-Cultural Context
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-4-123-144
EDN: TKFJNJ
Abstract
The article assesses bioethical issues of surrogacy from a Christian perspective and the possibility of adopting a cryopreserved embryo in the current socio-cultural context. Pregnancy of an adopting woman represents only a visible, technical similarity to the surrogacy; it is now commonly called “snowflake adoption.” In fact, such a pregnancy implies a different meaning and different goals. The study considers the following ethical dilemma: an invasion into marital union while using surrogacy for embryo adoption versus the potential death of an embryo in the absence of surrogacy. Any person, as Christian anthropology claims, originates from the first moment of conception. Therefore, respect for personal dignity includes the preservation of life and health at the embryonic stage even in a cryopreserved state. The potential death of a frozen embryo would be considered a more significant ethical evil than the intrusion of an adoptive mother into a marital union. Thus, snowflake adoption can be ethically justified to save a cryopreserved embryo if a woman adopts it and will raise the born child.
About the Author
Roman Tarabrin
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Afanasʹeva, E.G. (2000) “Otlovski M. Delo Ėvelin — razmyshleniia o pervom v Avstralii sudebnom protsesse o surrogatnom materinstve” [Otlowski M. Re Evelin reflections on Australia’s first litigated surrogacy case], Sotsialʹnye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaia i zarubezhnaia literatura. Ser. 4. Gosudarstvo i pravo: Referativnyi zhurnal 4: 128–130.
2. Bertin, A. (1992) Vospitanie v utrobe materi, ili rasskaz ob upushchennykh vozmozhnostiakh [Education in the womb, or a story about missed opportunities]. SPb.: MNPO “ZHiznʹ”.
3. Byrd, W. (2002) “Cryopreservation, Thawing, and Transfer of Human Embryos”, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 20(1).
4. Caplan, A. (2018) “An alternative proposal to the destruction of abandoned human embryos”, Nature Biotechnology 36(2): 139–141.
5. Chursanov, S.A. (2013) “Obraz Bozhii (pravosl.)” [“Image of God (Orthodox)”], in Prot. A. Lorgus, B. Shtubenraukh (eds) Bogoslovskaia antropologiia. Russko-pravoslavnyi/rimsko-katolicheskii slovarʹ. M.: Palomnik; Nikeia.
6. Collishaw, S., et al. (2007) “Resilience to adult psychopathology following childhood maltreatment: evidence from a community sample”, Child Abuse Negl. 31(3): 211–29.
7. Dobriakov, I.V. (2010) Perinatalʹnaia psikhologiia [Perinatal psychology]. SPb.: Piter.
8. Engelhardt, H.T. (ed.) (2000) The Foundations of Christian Bioethics. Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger publishers.
9. Filippova, G.G. (2002) Psikhologiia materinstva: Uchebnoe posobie [Maternal Psychology: Study Guide]. M.: Izd-vo Instituta psikhoterapii.
10. Glenister, P.H., Whittingham, D.G., Lyon, M.F. (1984) “Further studies on the effect of radiation during the storage of frozen 8-cell mouse embryos at 196°C”, Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 70: 229–234.
11. Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C. (2007) “Cognitive Dissonance Theory After 50 Years of Development”, Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 38(1): 7–16.
12. Hobson, R.P. (2002) The Cradle of Thought: Exploring the Origins of Thinking. Macmillan: London.
13. Ioann (Ziziulas), mitr. (1998) “Lichnostʹ i bytie” [“Personhood and Being”, in: John D. Zizioulas. Being as Communion. 1985], Nachalo — Zhurnal Sankt-Peterburgskogo Instituta Bogosloviia i Filosofii 6.
14. Ioann Zlatoust, sviatitelʹ. (1905) “Besedy na poslanie k Kolosianam [Conversations on the Epistle to the Colossians]. Beseda 12 Kol. 4:12–13”, Tvoreniia sviatago ottsa nashego Ioanna Zlatousta, arkhiepiskopa Konstantinopolʹskogo, T. 11, kniga 1. SPb: Izdanie Sankt-Peterburgskoi Dukhovnoi Akademii.
15. Jadva, V. et. al. (2003) “Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers”, Hum Reprod 18: 2196–2204.
16. Kant, I. (1963–1966) “Kritika prakticheskogo razuma” [Critique of practical reason], in Kant, I. Sobranie sochinenii v 6 t., IV, ch. 1. M.
17. Lamba, N., et. al. (2018) “The psychological well-being and prenatal bonding of gestational surrogates”, Human Reproduction 33(4): 646–653.
18. Levine, A. et al. (2007) “Oxytocin during pregnancy and early postpartum: individual patterns and maternal-fetal attachment”, Peptides 28(6): 1162–9.
19. Lyerly, A., Steinhauser, K., Voils, C. et al. (2010) “Fertility patients’ views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey”, Fertility and Sterility 93(2): 499–509.
20. Maya, N., Seth, R. (2012) “National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys”.
21. McMahon, C., et. al. (2000) “Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks, and embryo dilemmas”, Reprod Technol 10.
22. Novyi zavet Gospoda Nashego Iisusa Khrista [New Testament of Our Lord Jesus Christ]. M.: Lepta, 2001.
23. “O kreshchenii mladentsev, rodivshikhsia pri pomoshchi ‘surrogatnoi materi’” [On the baptism of babies born with surrogacy] (2013), Zhurnal zasedaniia Sviashchennogo Sinoda Russkoi Pravoslavnoi TSerkvi, 25–26 December (№ 158) [http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/3481024.html, accessed on 25.04.20].
24. Osnovy sotsialʹnoi kontseptsii Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi [Basis of the social concept of the Russian Orthodox Church] (2008). M.: Otdel vneshnikh tserkovnykh sviazei Moskovskogo Patriarkhata.
25. Pianta, R., Egeland, B., Erickson, M.F. (1989) “The antecedents of maltreatment: results of the Mother-Child Interaction Research Project”, D. Cicchetti, V. Carlson (eds) Child Maltreatment: Theory and Research on the Causes and Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect, pp. 203–253. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Ragoné, H. (1994) Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview Press.
27. Sutton, A. (2015) “Who Is My Mother and Who Are My Brothers?”, Christian Bioethics 21(2): 166–180.
28. Tarabrin, R. (2020). “Orthodox Perspectives on In Vitro Fertilization in Russia”, Christian Bioethics 26(2).
29. Tarabrin, R.E. (2018) “Analiz metodiki kriokonservatsii ėmbrionov pri ekstrakorporalʹnom oplodotvorenii s tochki zreniia pravoslavnoi bioėtiki” [Analysis of embryo cryopreservation for In Vitro Fertilization from Orthodox bioethics’ perspective], Bioėtika. 2018 № 2(22). P. 16–19.
30. Tieu, M. (2007) “Oh Baby Baby: The Problem of Surrogacy”, Bioethics Research Notes 19 (1, March).
31. Van den Akker, Olga B.A. (2007) “Psychosocial Aspects of Surrogate Motherhood”, Human Reproduction Update 13(1): 53–62.
32. Vasilii Velikii, sviatitelʹ. (2012) “K Amfilokhiiu o pravilakh. Tretʹe kanonicheskoe poslanie” [To Amphilochius about the rules. Third canonical epistle], in Vasilii Velikii, svt. Tvoreniia v dvukh tomakh. M: Sibirskaia blagozvonnitsa, 2012.
33. Whitehead, M.B., Schwartz, L. (1989) A Mother’s Story: The Truth About the Baby M Case. New York: St. Martins Press.
34. Zyl, L. van, Nierkerk, van A. (2000) “Interpretations, Perspectives and Intentions in Surrogate Motherhood”, Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 404–409.
Review
For citations:
Tarabrin R. Ethical Dilemmas of Surrogacy: Christian Discourse in Contemporary Socio-Cultural Context. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2020;38(4):123-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-4-123-144. EDN: TKFJNJ
Views:
1
Email this article 