Bioethics and the Culture Wars
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-4-67-91
EDN: QYHEVH
Abstract
The term “culture wars” has been used to describe deep, apparently intractable, disagreements between groups for many years. In contemporary discourse, it refers to disputes regarding significant moral matters carried out in the public square and for which there appears to be no way to achieve consensus or compromise. One set of battle lines is drawn between those who hold traditional Christian commitments and those who do not. Christian bioethics is nested in a set of moral and metaphysical understandings that collide with those of the dominant secular culture. The result is a gulf between a moral life and an approach to bioethics framed in the face of a transcendent God and a final judgment versus a moral life and an approach to bioethics framed as if the world were without ultimate meaning and as if death were the end of personal existence. These approaches are separated by a moral and metaphysical gulf that sustains incompatible life worlds and incompatible understandings of bioethics. Attempts to bridge the gulf with secular reason are ineffective because there is no shared conception of reason or standard of evidence. Efforts to use the state to enforce a particular set of metaphysical and moral commitments, whether secular or religious, lead to public disputes with a war-like character.
References
1. Alexander, J. (2005) "Promising, professional obligations, and the refusal to provide a service", HEC Forum 17: 177-94.
2. Beecher, H.K. and Harvard Ad Hoc Committee. (1968) "A definition of irreversible coma: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death", Journal of the American Medical Association 205: 33740.
3. Catholics for a Choice (1998) A Matter of Conscience: Catholics on Contraception [http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/topics/prevention/documents/1998amatterofconsciec e.pdf, accessed on 4.02.2011].
4. Clark, C., Kaiser, W. (2003) Culture Wars. Secular-Catholic Conflict in Nineteenth Century Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (1980) Declaration on Euthanasia. Vatican City: The Holy See.
6. Curran, C.E. (2006) Loyal Dissent: Memoir of a Catholic Theologian. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
7. Davis, D. (2001) Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choice. New York: Routledge.
8. Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. (1996) The Foundations of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. (2010) "Political authority in the face of moral pluralism: Further reflections on the non-fundamentalist state", Politea 26(97): 91-9.
10. Gastmans, C., Van Neste, F. and Schotsmans, P. (2006) "Pluralism and ethical dialogue in Christian healthcare institutions", Christian Bioethics 12: 265-80.
11. Grisez, G., Boyle, J., Finnis, J. (2001) Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Grisez, G., Boyle, J., Finnis, J., William, E. (1988) "Every marital act ought to be open to new life: Toward a clearer understanding", The Thomist 2: 365-426.
13. Grisez, G., Finnis, J., Boyle, J. (1987) "Practical principles, moral truth, and ultimate ends", The American Journal of Jursprudence 32: 99-151.
14. Hunter, J.D. (1992) Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
15. Iltis, A.S. (2009) "The failed search for the neutral in the secular: Public bioethics in the face of the culture wars", Christian Bioethics 15: 220-33.
16. Iltis, A.S. (2010) "First things first: On the importance of foundational moral commitments", Christian Bioethics 16: 229-40.
17. Iltis, A.S. (2011) "Global bioethics and natural law", in C. Tollefsen (ed.) Bioethics with Liberty and Justice, pp. 145-62. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
18. Mitchell, C.B. (2004) "Southern Baptists and bioethics", in J.F. Peppin, M.J. Cherry, A.S. Iltis (eds) Religious Perspectives in Bioethics, pp. 97-108. London: Taylor and Francis.
19. New Jersey Declaration of Death Act. (1991) New Jersey Statues Annotated, Title 26, secs. 6A-1 to 6A-8.
20. New York. (1987) Official Compilation Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York, 1987. Title 10 (Vol. C) - Health, Part 400 Medical Facilities -Minimum Standards, Section 400.16 Determination of Death [http://w3.health.state.ny.us/ dbspace/NYCRR10.nsf/56cf2e25d626f9f785256538006c3ed7/, accessed on 23.02.2011].
21. Olick, R.S. (1991) "Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey's landmark legislative initiative", Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1: 275-88.
22. Paul V.I. (1968) Humanae Vitae. Vatican City: The Holy See.
23. Peppin, J.F., Cherry, M.J., Iltis, A. S. (ed.) (2004) Religious Perspectives in Bioethics. London: Taylor and Francis.
24. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1981) Defining Death: Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
25. Robertson, J. (2005) "Ethics and the future of preimplantation genetic diagnosis", Ethics, Law and Moral Philosophy of Reproductive Biomedicine 1: 97-101.
26. Sandel, M. (2004) "The case against perfection", The Atlantic Online, April 2004 [http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2004/04/sandel.htm, accessed on 04.02.2011].
27. Savulescu, J. (2001) "Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children", Bioethics 5/6: 413-26.
28. Sun, L., and Shi, J. (2009) "Thoughts on cultural crisis and national identity", Asian Social Science 5: 138-40.
29. Takala, T. (2001) "What is wrong with global bioethics? On the limitations of the four principles approach", Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10: 72-7.
30. Tan Alora, A., Lumitao, J.M. (ed.) (2001) Beyond a Western Bioethics: Voices from the Developing World. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31. Truog, R.D. (1997) "Is it time to abandon brain death?" Hastings Center Report 27: 29-37.
32. Truog, R. D., Fackler, J.C. (1992) "Rethinking brain death", Critical Care Medicine 20: 1705-13.
33. Truog, R.D., Miller, F.G. (2008) "The dead donor rule and organ transplantation", New England Journal of Medicine 359: 674-5.
34. Uniform Determination of Death Act. (1981) National Conference on Commissioners of Uniform State Laws [http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/archives/ulc/fnact99/1980s/udda80.ht, accessed on 23.10.2009].
35. Veatch, R.M. (1993) "The impending collapse of the whole-brain definition of death", Hastings Center Report 23: 18-24.
36. Veatch, R.M. (2004) "Abandon the dead donor rule or change the definition of death?" Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14: 261-76.
37. Veatch, R.M. (2005) "The death of Whole-brain death: The plague of the disaggregators, somaticists, and mentalists", The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30: 353-78.
38. Wildes, K.Wm. (2000) Moral Acquaintances: Methodology in Bioethics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Review
For citations:
Iltis A.S. Bioethics and the Culture Wars. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2020;38(4):67-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-4-67-91. EDN: QYHEVH
Views:
1
Email this article 