Alvin Plantinga and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Natural Knowledge of God
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-1-261-283
EDN: XKXNQO
Abstract
Traditionally Aquinas is considered as the leading representative of the position that natural theology is the king road to the knowledge of God by means of human reason alone. Nevertheless, Alvin Plantinga cites him along with John Calvin among the two main predecessors of his famous idea of sensus divinitatis. According to this idea, human reason can have natural knowledge of God via special cognitive mechasnism, which is closer to the functioning of human perception, than to the proofs along the line of traditional theologia naturalis. The goal of the article is to identify whether one can really find in the work of Aquinas anything similar to the sensus divinitatis of Plantinga. And if the answer is positive, then how exactly does this epistemic mechanism perform the function of rational justification of theistic beliefs? As a result, I claim that in Aquinas one can really find something that could be called sensus divinitatis, but its justificatory work functions in a way that is quite different from that of Plantinga, because it involves the natural orientation of the human will to God as the ultimate goal of human life.
References
1. Foma Akvinskii. Summa teologii. Chast' pervaia. Voprosy 1-64 / Per. A.V. Apollonov. Moskva, 2006.
2. Foma Akvinskii. Summa protiv iazychnikov. Kniga pervaia / Per. T.Yu. Borodaĭ. Moskva, 2004.
3. Shokhin V.K. "Estestvennaia teologiia" // Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia. M., 2013 [http:// www.pravenc.ru/text/190259.html, dostup ot 15.05.2019].
4. Appolonov A.V. (ed.) (2006) Foma Akvinskii. Summa teologii. Chast' pervaia. Voprosy 1-64 [Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae. Part 1. Questions 1-64]. Moskva.
5. Borodaj T.Yu. (ed.) (2004) Foma Akvinskii. Summa protiv iazychnikov. Kniga pervaia [Thomas Aquinas. Summa contra Gentiles. First book]. Moskva.
6. Cooper, A.G. (2012) "Degrading the Body, Supressing the Truth. Aquinas on Romans 1: 18-25", in M. Levering, M. Dauphinai (eds.) Reading Romans with St. Thomas, pp. 113-126. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
7. Evans, S.C. (2010) Natural Signs and Knowledge of God. A New Look at Theistic Arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Jenkins, J.I. (1997) Knowledge and Faith in Thomas Aquinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. MacDonald, S. (1993) "Theory of Knowledge", in N. Kretzmann, E. Stamp (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, pp. 160-195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Niederbacher, B. (2012) "The Relation of Reason to Faith", in B. Davis, E. Stump (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, pp. 338-347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Pickavé, M. (2012) "Human Knowledge", in B. Davis, E. Stump (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, pp. 311-326. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Plantinga, A. (1983) "Reason and Belief in God", in A. Plantinga, N. Wolterstorff (eds), Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, pp. 17-93. Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
13. Plantinga, A. (2000) Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Shokhin, V.K. "Estestvennaia teologiia" [Natural theology], in Patriarkh Kirill (ed.) Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia [http://www.pravenc.ru/text/190259.html, accessed on 15.05.2019].
15. Stump, E. (2003) Aquinas. London and New York: Routledge.
16. Tuninetti, L.F. (1996) "Per se notum": Logische Beschaffenheit des Selbstverständlichen im Denken des Thomas von Aquinas. Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill.
17. Wolterstorff, N. (1984) Reason within the Bounds of Religion. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Review
For citations:
Gasparov I. Alvin Plantinga and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Natural Knowledge of God. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2020;38(1):261-283. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-1-261-283. EDN: XKXNQO
Views:
1
Email this article 