Preview

State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide

Advanced search

Modeling Meanings in Contemporary Mosque Architecture

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2024-42-1-167-193

Abstract

The article discusses the ability of mosque architecture to express meanings beyond those that are purely religious — first of all, to serve as an instrument of political rhetoric. In contemporary Islamic architectural practice (including Russia) following historical patterns, into which other meanings are invested, is becoming widespread. Using the historic neoOttoman trend in the architecture of the Republic of Turkey as an example, the author demonstrates the use of a mosque to proclaim the current doctrine of neoOttomanism, which combines nationalist and religious ideas. The spread of this trend as a result of the “diplomacy of architecture” led to a narrowing of the scale of formal searches in the construction of mosques at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries, and very different meanings could be invested in the same borrowed architectural forms (panTurkism, panIslamism, appeal to national traditions). The recent competition of projects for the Kazan Cathedral Mosque demonstrates, on the one hand, an attempt to limit the spread of neoOttoman forms and create a new example of the national style, but, on the other hand, it showed the dependence on existing patterns and the inability of architects to offer a clear alternative to these forms, which would be close to believers and understandable to the citizens. The ability of the architectural image of a contemporary mosque to rhetorically convey certain meanings (even not taken into account by customers and architects) is more important than the very fact of creating a mosque as a religious building.

About the Author

E. Kononenko
State Institute for Art Studies
Russian Federation

Evgenii Kononenko — Head of the Department of Asian and African Art

Moscow



References

1. Аватков В.А. Неоосманизм. Базовая идеологема и геостратегия Турции//Свободная мысль. 2014. № 3. С. 71–78.

2. Ванеян С.С. Тело символа. Архитектурный символизм в зеркале классической методологии. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2010.

3. Грабар О. Формирование исламского искусства. М.: Садра, 2016.

4. Ибрагимов И.А. Архитектура современных российских мечетей //Академический вестник УралНИИпроект РААСН. 2011. № 2. С. 53–58.

5. Иконников А.В. Функция, форма, образ в архитектуре. М.: Стройиздат, 1986.

6. Киреев Н. Г. История Турции. ХХ век. М.: ИВ РАН, Крафт+, 2007.

7. Кононенко Е. И. Архитектура мечети как объект интерпретации //Вестник СПбГУ. Серия 15. Искусствоведение. 2018. Т. 8. № 1. С. 113–130.

8. Кононенко Е. И. «Большая османская мечеть»//Культура Востока. Вып. 3. «Визитные карточки» восточных культур. М.: ГИИ, 2018. С. 92–117.

9. Кононенко Е. И. В ожидании «суперпроекта»: ориентиры турецкой мечети//Азия и Африка сегодня. 2014. № 4. С. 63–68.

10. Кононенко Е. И. Пространство мечети: «временная ритуализация» //Культура Востока. Вып. 4. Границы сакральных пространств. М.: ГИИ, 2019. С. 72–97.

11. Кононенко Е. И. Турецкая мечеть: между неоклассикой и не-классикой// Искусствознание. 2014. № 3–4. С. 155–182.

12. Лотман Ю.М. Каноническое искусство как информационный парадокс // Проблема канона в древнем и средневековом искусстве Азии и Африки. М.: Наука, 1973. С. 16–22.

13. Мехдиев Э.Т. «Неоосманизм» в региональной политике Турции//Вестник МГИМОУниверситета. 2016. № 2 (47). С. 32–39.

14. Садр адДин алХусайни. Ахбар ад-даулат ас-сельджукийа (Сообщения о Сельджукском государстве. Сливки летописей, сообщающих о сельджукских эмирах и государях). М.: Восточная литература, 1980.

15. Стародуб Т. Х. Мечеть. Термин и архитектурный тип//Вестник Московского университета. Серия 13. Востоковедение. 2006. № 4. С. 54–73.

16. Червонная С.М. Современная мечеть. Отечественный и мировой опыт Новейшего времени. Торунь: Польский институт исследований мирового искусства; Изд-во Тако, 2016.

17. Чернышева Е. Громкие споры вокруг столичных памятников // Коммерсантъ. 08.06.2015.

18. Шукуров Ш.М. Архитектура современной мечети. Истоки. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2014.

19. Эко У. Отсутствующая структура. Введение в семиологию. СПб.: Петрополис, 1998.

20. Ashkan, M., Ahmad, Y., Arbi, E. (2012) “Pointed Dome Architecture in the Middle East and Central Asia: Evolution, Definitions of Morphology, and Typologies”, International Journal of Architectural Heritage 6(1): 46–61.

21. Batuman, B. (2016) “Architectural mimicry and the politics of mosque building: negotiating Islam and Nation in Turkey”, The Journal of Architecture 21(3): 321–347.

22. von Beyme, K. (1996) “Politische Ikonologie der Architektur”, in Hipp, H., Seidl, E. (eds) Architektur als politische Kultur, ss. 19–34. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.

23. Bianco, L. (2018) “Architecture, values and perception: Between rhetoric and reality”, Frontiers of Architectural Research 7: 92–99.

24. Cagaptay, S. (2019) “Making Turkey Great Again”, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 43(1): 169–178.

25. Çamlıca’ya yapılacak cami taklit mi? Milliyet. 16.11.2012.

26. Creswell, K.A. C. (1989) A Short Account of Early Muslim Architecture. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.

27. Demirer, Y. (2007) “Constructing a High-Society Mosque: The Controversy and Significance of the Şakirin Mosque in Istanbul, Turkey”, Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 40(2): 3–17.

28. Dural, M. (2017) Çağdaş Cami Mimarisinde Kubbe Ögesinin Algisal Etkisinin Mimari Eğitim Seviyesine Göre Farklilaşmasi. İstanbul: Yüksek Lisans tezi.

29. Hattenhauer, D. (1984) “The rhetoric of architecture: A semiotic approach”, Communication Quarterly 32(1): 71–77.

30. Holod, R., Khan H., Mims K. (1997) The Contemporary Mosque. Architects, Clients and Designs since the 1950s. N.Y.: Rizzoli.

31. Kononenko, E. (2023) “The image of the Kaaba in the contemporary architecture of the mosque: Returning to the competition in Kazan”, Problems of Arts and Culture. International Scientific Journal 3: 47–59.

32. Rizvi, K. (2015) The Transnational Mosque. Architecture and Historical Memory in the Contemporary Middle East. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

33. Schlanger, J. (2001) “Introspection, retrospection, prospection”, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 4: 527–541.

34. Türkiye Diyanet Foundation. Our Mosques (2011). Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfi.


Review

For citations:


Kononenko E. Modeling Meanings in Contemporary Mosque Architecture. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2024;42(1):167-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2024-42-1-167-193

Views: 99


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7203 (Print)
ISSN 2073-7211 (Online)