Preview

State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide

Advanced search

Eunuchs of the Kingdom. Interpretation of Matthew 19:12 in the Early Christian Movement

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-2-201-231

EDN: PYMENU

Abstract

Many biblical texts mention eunuchs (ewovxog, ОТО). In the Hebrew Bible the term saris appears mainly as an element of the administrative apparatus. In the New Testament the image of the eunuch becomes the subject of theological reflection. In the Gospel of Matthew, Christ says that there are “Eunuchs who have made themselves Eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 19:12). The article examines this verse, its Sitz im Leben, and traces its influence on both Christian theology and the religious practice of the followers of Christ. For a long time, the eunuchs in Matthew 19:12 have been seen by commentators as a model of chastity, an ideal member of the Christian Church, a prototype of a monk. However, the analysis of ancient texts shows how morally ambiguous the image of the eunuch was. In the ancient Mediterranean, the eunuch was the epitome of transgression of all norms related to family and sexual life. Through this image, everything that seemed eternal and reasonable was called into question. Hence, the image of eunuch given as a positive ideal denied the triumphant heterosexual binary model in which such things as family, gender, and gender identity were inscribed.

About the Author

Alexey Volchkov
St. Petersburg Theological Academy
Russian Federation


References

1. Adam, A.K.M. (2000) Handbook of Postmodern Biblical Interpretation. St. Louis, Mo.: Chalice.

2. Blinzler, J. (1957) "Eloiv efcvouxoi: Zur Auslegung von Mt 19.12", Zeitschrift fur die neutes-tamentliche Wissenschaft 48: 254-270.

3. Brown, P. (2008) The Body and Society: Men, Women, And Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York, Chichester: Columbia University Press.

4. Caner, D. (1997) "The Practice and Prohibition of Self-Castration in Early Christianity", Vigiliae Christianae 51(4): 396-415.

5. Chadwick H. (2003) The Sentences of Sextus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

6. Cornelius, S. (2009) "Eunuchs? The Ancient Background Of Eunouchos In The Septuagint", in J. Cook (ed.) Septuagint and Reception, pp. 321-333. Brill.

7. Davies, W.D., Allison, D.C. (2004) A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Vol. 3. London, New York: T&T Clark International.

8. Dodds, E.R. (2003) Iazychnik i khristianin v smutnoe vremia: nekotorye aspekty religioznykh praktik v period ot Marka Avreliia do Konstantina [Pagan and Christian in Time of Troubles: Some Aspects of Religious Practices from Marcus Aurelius to Constantine]. Sankt-Peterburg: Gumanitarnaia Akademiia.

9. Duthoy, R. (1969) The Taurobolium: Its Evolution and Terminology. Boston: Brill.

10. Engel'shtejn, L. (2002) Skopcy i carstvo nebesnoe [Skoptsy and the kingdom of heaven]. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie.

11. Guyot, P. (1980) Eunuchen als Sklaven und Freigelassene in der griechisch-romischen Antike. Klett-Cotta.

12. Hester, J. David (2005) "Eunuchs and the Postgender Jesus: Matthew 19.12 and Transgressive Sexualities", Journal for the Study of the New Testament 28(1): 13-40.

13. Kuefler, M. (2001) The Manly Eunuch: Masculinity, Gender Ambiguity, and Christian Ideology in Late Antiquity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14. Llewelyn, S., Gareth J., Bianca, L. (2012) "Guarding Entry to the Kingdom: The Place of Eunuchs in Mt. 19.12", Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 10(3): 228246.

15. Moxnes, H. (2003) Putting Jesus in His Place: A Radical Vision of Household and Kingdom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

16. Nikodim Svyatogorec (2019) Pidalion: Pravila Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi s tolkovaniyami v 4-h tomah [Pidalion: The Rules of the Orthodox Church with Interpretations in 4 Volumes]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo Aleksandro-Nevskogo Novo-Tihvinskogo zhenskogo monastyrya.

17. Nock, A. D. (1925) Eunuchs in Ancient Religion, Teubner.

18. Olson, C. (2008) Celibacy and Religious Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.

19. Quesnell, Q. (1968) "Made themselves eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven" (Mt. 19,12)", Catholic Biblical Quarterly 33(4): 335-358.

20. Rousselle, A. (1983) Porneia: De la maitrise du corps a la privation sensorielle, IIe-IVe siecles de lere chretienne.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

21. Scholten, H. (1995) Der Eunuch in Kaisernahe: Zur politischen und sozialen Bedeutung des.,praepositus sacri cubiculi" im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert n. Chr. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.

22. Stevenson, W. (1995) "The Rise of Eunuchs in Greco-Roman Antiquity", Journal of the History of Sexuality 5(4): 495-511.

23. Talbott, R. (2006) "Imagining the Matthean Eunuch Community: Kyriarchy on the Chopping Block", Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 22(1): 21-43.

24. Tougher, S., Ra'anan A. (2002) Eunuchs in Antiquity and Beyond. London, Duckworth.

25. Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (2003) The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

26. Volchkov A. (2016) "Zhenskie sluzheniya v rannem hristianstve [Women's ministries in early Christianity]", Bogomyslie 18: 62-77.


Review

For citations:


Volchkov A. Eunuchs of the Kingdom. Interpretation of Matthew 19:12 in the Early Christian Movement. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2021;39(2):201-231. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-2-201-231. EDN: PYMENU

Views: 1


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7203 (Print)
ISSN 2073-7211 (Online)