Who Is Hiding in the Shadows: The Outlines of Dark Ecclesiology
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-2-6l-89
EDN: QEGCLI
Abstract
The article describes dark ecclesiology, a new theological theory of the church. According to the author, it represents a strategy of emancipation of the ecclesiastical thought and practice from clericocentrism. For centuries, ecclesiology focused on describing hierarchical structures that shaped normativity within the church. Everything strange and abnormal remained in the shadows. “Invisible" groups (women; queer people; unbaptized; human embryos; animals and other non-human living beings) fall into the shadow area and are excluded by the clerical authorities from the scope of ecclesiology. Dark ecclesiology allows for a fresh look at the church. As a theological research method, it reconsiders the church's composition, structure, and boundaries; it provides an opportunity to speak about earlier excluded church actors and things, avoiding their forced normalization within the framework of mainstream ecclesiological theories. The critical potential of dark ecclesiology makes it possible to reveal the contingency of church norms and the arbitrariness of the exclusion from the church of those who consider themselves to be church members. Shadow actors are described through theological infra-language, which is a way of correlating different perspectives and narratives in one space through which they express their belonging to the church. Dark eccle-siology refers to a flat ontology that asserts the ontological equality of all actors, including God. Methodologically, it uses the ideas of object-oriented philosophers (T. Morton, G. Harman, and others) and B.
About the Author
Andrey Shishkov
School of Theology and Religious Studies of the University of Tartu
Estonia
Estonia
References
1. Afanas’ev, N. (1971) Tserkovʹ Dukha Sviatogo [The Church of Holy Spirit]. Paris: YMCA-Press.
2. Anonymous (2018) “Pravoslavie i seksual’nost’: opyt tserkovnogo razmyshleniia o Boge i cheloveke” [Orthodoxy and Sexuality: Some Random Reflections on the Doctrine of God and Antropology], “Ibo ia divno ustroen’: sbornik tekstov o pravoslavii i inkliuzii, LGBT-liudei pp. 18–26. Amsterdam: Evropeiskii forum LGBT-khristianskikh grupp.
3. Averintsev S.S. (1976) “Sudʹby evropeiskoi kulʹturnoi traditsii v epokhu perekhoda ot antichnosti k Srednevekovʹiu” [“The Fate of the European Cultural Tradition in the Era of Transition from Antiquity to the Middle Ages”], in Iz istorii kulʹtury Srednikh vekov i Vozrozhdeniia, pp. 17–64. Moscow: Nauka.
4. Bogost, I. (2012) Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Bryant, L. (2014) Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
6. Bryant, L.R. (2011) The Democracy of Objects. Open Humanities Press.
7. Cherniak, M. (2018) “Vozmozhnost’ LGBTI-affirmativnogo diskursa v Pravoslavnoi tserkvi: slozhnosti i perspektivy” [Potential LGBTI-Affirmative Discourse of the Orthodox Church: Challenges and Hopes], “Ibo ia divno ustroen”: sbornik tekstov o pravoslavii i inkliuzii LGBT-liudei, pp. 141–156. Amsterdam: Evropeiskii forum LGBT-khristianskikh grupp.
8. Cobb Jr., J.B., Griffin, D.R. (1976) Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.
9. DeLanda, M. (2013) Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. Rev. ed. London, New York: Bloomsbery Academic.
10. DeLanda, M. (2017) “Novaia ontologiia dlia sotsialʹnykh nauk” [A New Ontology for the Social Sciences], Logos 3: 35–56.
11. Dulles, A. (1991) Models of the Church. New York, NY: Image Books
12. Fedotov, G. (1938) “Eskhatologiia i kulʹtura” [Eschatology and Culture], Novyi Grad. 13: 45–56.
13. Filaret, st. (2013) Prostrannyi khristianskii katekhizis Pravoslavnoi kafolicheskoi vostoch-noi tserkvi [The Large Christian Catechism of the Orthodox Catholic Eastern Church]. M.: Sibirskaia blagozvonnitsa.
14. Fudelʹ, S.I. (2001) Sobranie sochinenii v 3-kh tomakh. Tom 1. [Collected Works Issued in Three Volumes. Vol. 1]. M.: Russkii putʹ.
15. Gregersen H.N. (2015) “The Extended Body of Christ: Three Dimensions of Deep Incarnation”, Incarnation: On the Scope and Depth of Christology, pp. 225–253. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
16. Harman G. (2018) Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Pelican.
17. Harman, G. (2011) The Quadruple Object. Winchester, U.K.; Washington, D.C.: Zero Books.
18. Harman, G. (2018) Speculative Realism: An Introduction. London: Polity.
19. Hjälm M. (2011) Liberation of the Ecclesia: The Unfinished Project of Liturgical Theology. Södertälje: Anastasis Media.
20. Hovorun, C. (2015) Meta-Ecclesiology: Chronicles on Church Awareness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2015.
21. Hovorun, C. (2017) Scaffolds of the Church: Towards Poststructural Ecclesiology. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
22. Kärkkäinen, V.M. (2002) An Introduction to Ecclesiology. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.
23. Keller, C. (2003) Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming. London, New York: Routledge.
24. Keller, C (2008) On the Mystery: Discerning God in Process. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
25. Khanova, P. (2019) “Temnye goroda: temnaia ėkologiia i Urban Studies” [Dark Cities: Dark Ecology and Urban Studies], Logos 5: 71–86.
26. Latour, B. (2017) “Ob aktorno-setevoi teorii. Nekotorye raz”iasneniia, dopolnennye eshche bolʹshimi uslozhneniiami” [On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications Plus More than a Few Complications], Logos 1: 173–200.
27. Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Latour, B. (2011) ‘‘‘Thou Shalt Not Take the Lord’s Name in Vain’: Being a Sort of Sermon on the Hesitations in Religious Speech’,’ RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 39: 215–234.
30. Lossky, V. (2006) “Po obrazu i podobiiu” [In the Image and], in Bogovidenie, pp. 570–581. Moscow: AST.
31. Meillassoux, Q. (2010) After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London: Continuum.
32. Miller A.S. (2013) Speculative Grace: Bruno Latour and Oblect-Oriented Theology. New York: Fordham University Press.
33. Moltmann, J. (1993) The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
34. Morton, T. (2016) Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.
35. Morton, T. (2007) Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Enviromental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press
36. Morton, T. (2013) Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.
37. Morton, T. (2017) Being Ecological. Penguin Books.
38. Nastolʹnaia kniga sviashchennosluzhitelia. Tom. 1. [Handbook for Clergy. Vol. 1] (1977). M.: Izdanie Moskovskoi Patriarkhii.
39. Shishkov A. (2015) “Struktura tserkovnogo upravleniia v evkharisticheskoi ėkkleziologii” [Structure of the Church Government in the Eucharistic Ecclesiology], Vestnik PST-GU Seriia I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia 1(57): 25–38.
40. Shishkov, A. (2017) “The Problematic Issues of Eucharist Ecclesiology in the Context of Contemporary Political Theology”, Political Theologies in Orthodox Christianity: Common Challenges and Divergent Positions, pp. 189–206. London; New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
41. Shishkov, A. (2021) “How Modern Orthodox Ecclesiology Hinders the Orthodox-Catholic Theological Dialogue on Uniatism: Romantic Approach, Nationalism, and Anti-colonial Narrative”, Stolen Churches or Bridges to Orthodoxy? (Vol. 2), pp. 125–138. Springer Nature — Palgrave McMillan.
42. Shishkov A.V. (2019) “V poiskakh novoi ėkkleziologicheskoi paradigmy” [Searching for a New Ecclesiological Paradigm], Voprosy teologii 2: 268–273.
43. Shirokov A.S. (2019) “Politika ob”iasneniia i strategiia opisaniia Bruno Latura: kak pisatʹ infrarefleksivnye teksty” [The Politics of Explanation and Strategy of Description of Bruno Latour: How to Write Infra-reflexive Texts], Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 1: 186–217.
44. Sventsitsky, V. (2017) Dialogi [Dialogues]. M.: Otchii dom.
45. Volf, M (1998) After Our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdemans.
46. White, L. (1967) “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis”, Science 155(3767): 1203–1207.
47. Whitehead, A.N. (1978) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected Edition. D.R. Griffin, D.W. Sherburne (eds.). New York: Free Press.
48. World Council of the Churches (2013) The Church: Towards a Common Vision. WCC Publications.
49. Zizioulas J. (1997) Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. Crestwood, NY: SVS Press.
Review
For citations:
Shishkov A. Who Is Hiding in the Shadows: The Outlines of Dark Ecclesiology. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2021;39(2):61-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-2-6l-89. EDN: QEGCLI
Views:
1
Email this article 