<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">religion</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2073-7203</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2073-7211</issn><publisher><publisher-name>РАНХиГС</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-2-6l-89</article-id><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">QEGCLI</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">religion-323</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Кто скрывается в тени: контуры темной экклезиологии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Who Is Hiding in the Shadows: The Outlines of Dark Ecclesiology</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шишков</surname><given-names>Андрей</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shishkov</surname><given-names>Andrey</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">andrey.v.shishkov@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Тартуский университет<country>Эстония</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">School of Theology and Religious Studies of the University of Tartu<country>Estonia</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>89</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Шишков А., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шишков А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shishkov A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://religion.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/323">https://religion.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/323</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена темной экклезиологии - новой богословской теории церкви, которая, по словам автора, представляет собой эмансипацию церковной мысли и практик от присущего им клерикоцентризма. На протяжении веков экклезиология концентрировалась на описании церковных иерархических (клерикальных) структур, через которые задавалась нормативность в церкви. Все странное и ненормативное при этом остается в тени, но продолжает существовать в церкви. В область тени попадают «невидимые» группы, которые оказываются исключенными клерикальной властью из пространства экклезиологии (женщины; квир-люди; некрещеные люди; человеческие эмбрионы; животные и другие нечеловеческие живые существа; священные предметы и вещи). Темная экклезиология позволяет по-новому взглянуть на церковь. Как метод теологических исследований церкви она заново ставит вопрос о ее составе, устройстве и границах. Обнаружение области «церковной тени» позволяет говорить о церковных акторах и вещах без их исключения из церкви или насильственной нормализации в рамках нормативных экклезиологических теорий. Критический потенциал темной экклезиологии позволяет вскрывать контингентность церковных норм и произвольность исключения из церкви тех, кто сам относит себя к церкви. Теневые акторы описываются средствами богословского инфраязыка, который представляет собой способ соотнесения в одном пространстве разных перспектив и нарративов, через которые они сами описывают свою принадлежность к церкви. Этот инфраязык позволяет также проводить между церковными акторами и вещами гораздо большее число связей, чем те языки, что задаются властными клерикальными нарративами (например, рассматривать евхаристию не только в рамках клерикально заданных ролей). Темная экклезиология обращается к плоской онтологии, утверждающей онтологическое равенство всех акторов, включая Бога. Методологически темная экклезиология использует идеи объектно-ориентированных философов (Т. Мортон, Г. Харман и др.) и акторно-сетевую теорию Б. Латура. В темной экклезиологии происходит, если пользоваться терминологией Латура, пересборка церковного коллектива.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article describes dark ecclesiology, a new theological theory of the church. According to the author, it represents a strategy of emancipation of the ecclesiastical thought and practice from clericocentrism. For centuries, ecclesiology focused on describing hierarchical structures that shaped normativity within the church. Everything strange and abnormal remained in the shadows. “Invisible" groups (women; queer people; unbaptized; human embryos; animals and other non-human living beings) fall into the shadow area and are excluded by the clerical authorities from the scope of ecclesiology. Dark ecclesiology allows for a fresh look at the church. As a theological research method, it reconsiders the church's composition, structure, and boundaries; it provides an opportunity to speak about earlier excluded church actors and things, avoiding their forced normalization within the framework of mainstream ecclesiological theories. The critical potential of dark ecclesiology makes it possible to reveal the contingency of church norms and the arbitrariness of the exclusion from the church of those who consider themselves to be church members. Shadow actors are described through theological infra-language, which is a way of correlating different perspectives and narratives in one space through which they express their belonging to the church. Dark eccle-siology refers to a flat ontology that asserts the ontological equality of all actors, including God. Methodologically, it uses the ideas of object-oriented philosophers (T. Morton, G. Harman, and others) and B.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Бруно Латур</kwd><kwd>Грэм Харман</kwd><kwd>декларикализация</kwd><kwd>инфраязык</kwd><kwd>контекстуальные теологии</kwd><kwd>объектно-ориентированная онтология</kwd><kwd>плоская онтология</kwd><kwd>темная экклезиология</kwd><kwd>Тимоти Мортон</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Bruno Latour</kwd><kwd>contextual theologies</kwd><kwd>dark ecclesiology</kwd><kwd>declericalisation</kwd><kwd>flat ontology</kwd><kwd>Graham Harman</kwd><kwd>infra-language</kwd><kwd>object-oriented ontology</kwd><kwd>Timothy Morton</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement>Статья подготовлена при поддержке Estonian Research Council, grant PRG 1274.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аверинцев С.С. Судьбы европейской культурной традиции в эпоху перехода от античности к Средневековью // Из истории культуры Средних веков и Возрождения. М.: Наука, 1976. С. 17-64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Afanas’ev, N. (1971) Tserkovʹ Dukha Sviatogo [The Church of Holy Spirit]. Paris: YMCA-Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Анонимный православный архиерей. Православие и сексуальность: опыт церковного размышления о Боге и человеке // "Ибо я дивно устроен": сборник текстов о православии и инклюзии ЛГБТ-людей. Амстердам: Европейский форум ЛГБТ-христианских групп, 2018. С. 20-29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anonymous (2018) “Pravoslavie i seksual’nost’: opyt tserkovnogo razmyshleniia o Boge i cheloveke” [Orthodoxy and Sexuality: Some Random Reflections on the Doctrine of God and Antropology], “Ibo ia divno ustroen’: sbornik tekstov o pravoslavii i inkliuzii, LGBT-liudei pp. 18–26. Amsterdam: Evropeiskii forum LGBT-khristianskikh grupp.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Афанасьев Н. Церковь Духа Святого. Париж: YMCA-Press, 1971.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Averintsev S.S. (1976) “Sudʹby evropeiskoi kulʹturnoi traditsii v epokhu perekhoda ot antichnosti k Srednevekovʹiu” [“The Fate of the European Cultural Tradition in the Era of Transition from Antiquity to the Middle Ages”], in Iz istorii kulʹtury Srednikh vekov i Vozrozhdeniia, pp. 17–64. Moscow: Nauka.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Богост Й. Чужая феноменология, или Каково быть вещью? Пермь: Гиле Пресс, 2019. Брайант Л. Демократия объектов. Пермь: Гиле Пресс, 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bogost, I. (2012) Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Деланда М. Новая онтология для социальных наук // Логос. 2017. № 3. С. 35-56. Латур Б. Пересборка социального: введение в акторно-сетевую теорию. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bryant, L. (2014) Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Латур Б. Политики природы. Как привить наукам демократию? М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2018.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bryant, L.R. (2011) The Democracy of Objects. Open Humanities Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Латур Б. Об акторно-сетевой теории. Некоторые разъяснения, дополненные еще большими усложнениями // Логос. 2017. Том 27. № 1. С. 173-200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cherniak, M. (2018) “Vozmozhnost’ LGBTI-affirmativnogo diskursa v Pravoslavnoi tserkvi: slozhnosti i perspektivy” [Potential LGBTI-Affirmative Discourse of the Orthodox Church: Challenges and Hopes], “Ibo ia divno ustroen”: sbornik tekstov o pravoslavii i inkliuzii LGBT-liudei, pp. 141–156. Amsterdam: Evropeiskii forum LGBT-khristianskikh grupp.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лосский В. По образу и подобию // Боговидение. М.: АСТ, 2006. С. 570-581.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cobb Jr., J.B., Griffin, D.R. (1976) Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мейясу К. После конечности: Эссе о необходимости контингентности. Екатеринбург, М.: Кабинетный ученый, 2016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DeLanda, M. (2013) Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. Rev. ed. London, New York: Bloomsbery Academic.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мортон Т. Гиперобъекты: Философия и экология после конца мира. Пермь: Гиле Пресс, 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DeLanda, M. (2017) “Novaia ontologiia dlia sotsialʹnykh nauk” [A New Ontology for the Social Sciences], Logos 3: 35–56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мортон Т. Стать экологичным. М.: Ад Маргинем, 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dulles, A. (1991) Models of the Church. New York, NY: Image Books</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Настольная книга священнослужителя. Том. 1. М.: Издание Московской Патриархии, 1977.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fedotov, G. (1938) “Eskhatologiia i kulʹtura” [Eschatology and Culture], Novyi Grad. 13: 45–56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Свенцицкий В., прот. Диалоги. М.: Отчий дом, 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Filaret, st. (2013) Prostrannyi khristianskii katekhizis Pravoslavnoi kafolicheskoi vostoch-noi tserkvi [The Large Christian Catechism of the Orthodox Catholic Eastern Church]. M.: Sibirskaia blagozvonnitsa.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Федотов Г. Эсхатология и культура // Новый Град. 1938. № 13. С. 45-56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fudelʹ, S.I. (2001) Sobranie sochinenii v 3-kh tomakh. Tom 1. [Collected Works Issued in Three Volumes. Vol. 1]. M.: Russkii putʹ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Филарет, свт. Пространный христианский катехизис Православной кафолической восточной церкви. М.: Сибирская благозвонница, 2013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gregersen H.N. (2015) “The Extended Body of Christ: Three Dimensions of Deep Incarnation”, Incarnation: On the Scope and Depth of Christology, pp. 225–253. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фудель С.И. Собрание сочинений в 3-х томах. Том 1. М.: Русский путь, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harman G. (2018) Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Pelican.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ханова П. Темные города: темная экология и Urban Studies // Логос. 2019. Том 29. № 5. С. 71-86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harman, G. (2011) The Quadruple Object. Winchester, U.K.; Washington, D.C.: Zero Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Харман Г. Спекулятивный реализм: Введение. М.: Рипол-Классик, 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harman, G. (2018) Speculative Realism: An Introduction. London: Polity.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Харман Г. Четвероякий объект: Метафизика вещей после Хайдеггера. Пермь: Гиле Пресс, 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hjälm M. (2011) Liberation of the Ecclesia: The Unfinished Project of Liturgical Theology. Södertälje: Anastasis Media.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Черняк М. Возможность ЛГБТИ-аффирмативного дискурса в Православной церкви: сложности и перспективы // "Ибо я дивно устроен": сборник текстов о православии и инклюзии ЛГБТ-людей. Амстердам: Европейский форум ЛГБТ-христианских групп, 2018. С. 157-173.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hovorun, C. (2015) Meta-Ecclesiology: Chronicles on Church Awareness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Широков А.С. Политика объяснения и стратегия описания Бруно Латура: как писать инфрарефлексивные тексты // Социологическое обозрение. 2019. Т. 18. № 1.С. 186-217.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hovorun, C. (2017) Scaffolds of the Church: Towards Poststructural Ecclesiology. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шишков А.В. В поисках новой экклезиологической парадигмы // Вопросы теологии. 2019. Том 1. № 2. С. 268-273.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kärkkäinen, V.M. (2002) An Introduction to Ecclesiology. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шишков А. Структура церковного управления в евхаристической экклезиологии // Вестник ПСТГУ Серия I: Богословие. Философия. 2015. Вып. 1(57). С. 2538.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keller, C. (2003) Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming. London, New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keller, C (2008) On the Mystery: Discerning God in Process. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keller, C (2008) On the Mystery: Discerning God in Process. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khanova, P. (2019) “Temnye goroda: temnaia ėkologiia i Urban Studies” [Dark Cities: Dark Ecology and Urban Studies], Logos 5: 71–86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khanova, P. (2019) “Temnye goroda: temnaia ėkologiia i Urban Studies” [Dark Cities: Dark Ecology and Urban Studies], Logos 5: 71–86.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Latour, B. (2017) “Ob aktorno-setevoi teorii. Nekotorye raz”iasneniia, dopolnennye eshche bolʹshimi uslozhneniiami” [On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications Plus More than a Few Complications], Logos 1: 173–200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Latour, B. (2017) “Ob aktorno-setevoi teorii. Nekotorye raz”iasneniia, dopolnennye eshche bolʹshimi uslozhneniiami” [On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications Plus More than a Few Complications], Logos 1: 173–200.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Latour, B. (2011) ‘‘‘Thou Shalt Not Take the Lord’s Name in Vain’: Being a Sort of Sermon on the Hesitations in Religious Speech’,’ RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 39: 215–234.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Latour, B. (2011) ‘‘‘Thou Shalt Not Take the Lord’s Name in Vain’: Being a Sort of Sermon on the Hesitations in Religious Speech’,’ RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 39: 215–234.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lossky, V. (2006) “Po obrazu i podobiiu” [In the Image and], in Bogovidenie, pp. 570–581. Moscow: AST.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lossky, V. (2006) “Po obrazu i podobiiu” [In the Image and], in Bogovidenie, pp. 570–581. Moscow: AST.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meillassoux, Q. (2010) After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London: Continuum.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meillassoux, Q. (2010) After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London: Continuum.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Miller A.S. (2013) Speculative Grace: Bruno Latour and Oblect-Oriented Theology. New York: Fordham University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miller A.S. (2013) Speculative Grace: Bruno Latour and Oblect-Oriented Theology. New York: Fordham University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moltmann, J. (1993) The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moltmann, J. (1993) The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morton, T. (2016) Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morton, T. (2016) Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morton, T. (2007) Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Enviromental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morton, T. (2007) Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Enviromental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morton, T. (2013) Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morton, T. (2013) Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morton, T. (2017) Being Ecological. Penguin Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morton, T. (2017) Being Ecological. Penguin Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nastolʹnaia kniga sviashchennosluzhitelia. Tom. 1. [Handbook for Clergy. Vol. 1] (1977). M.: Izdanie Moskovskoi Patriarkhii.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nastolʹnaia kniga sviashchennosluzhitelia. Tom. 1. [Handbook for Clergy. Vol. 1] (1977). M.: Izdanie Moskovskoi Patriarkhii.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shishkov A. (2015) “Struktura tserkovnogo upravleniia v evkharisticheskoi ėkkleziologii” [Structure of the Church Government in the Eucharistic Ecclesiology], Vestnik PST-GU Seriia I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia 1(57): 25–38.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shishkov A. (2015) “Struktura tserkovnogo upravleniia v evkharisticheskoi ėkkleziologii” [Structure of the Church Government in the Eucharistic Ecclesiology], Vestnik PST-GU Seriia I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia 1(57): 25–38.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shishkov, A. (2017) “The Problematic Issues of Eucharist Ecclesiology in the Context of Contemporary Political Theology”, Political Theologies in Orthodox Christianity: Common Challenges and Divergent Positions, pp. 189–206. London; New York: Bloomsbury T&amp;T Clark.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shishkov, A. (2017) “The Problematic Issues of Eucharist Ecclesiology in the Context of Contemporary Political Theology”, Political Theologies in Orthodox Christianity: Common Challenges and Divergent Positions, pp. 189–206. London; New York: Bloomsbury T&amp;T Clark.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shishkov, A. (2021) “How Modern Orthodox Ecclesiology Hinders the Orthodox-Catholic Theological Dialogue on Uniatism: Romantic Approach, Nationalism, and Anti-colonial Narrative”, Stolen Churches or Bridges to Orthodoxy? (Vol. 2), pp. 125–138. Springer Nature — Palgrave McMillan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shishkov, A. (2021) “How Modern Orthodox Ecclesiology Hinders the Orthodox-Catholic Theological Dialogue on Uniatism: Romantic Approach, Nationalism, and Anti-colonial Narrative”, Stolen Churches or Bridges to Orthodoxy? (Vol. 2), pp. 125–138. Springer Nature — Palgrave McMillan.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shishkov A.V. (2019) “V poiskakh novoi ėkkleziologicheskoi paradigmy” [Searching for a New Ecclesiological Paradigm], Voprosy teologii 2: 268–273.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shishkov A.V. (2019) “V poiskakh novoi ėkkleziologicheskoi paradigmy” [Searching for a New Ecclesiological Paradigm], Voprosy teologii 2: 268–273.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shirokov A.S. (2019) “Politika ob”iasneniia i strategiia opisaniia Bruno Latura: kak pisatʹ infrarefleksivnye teksty” [The Politics of Explanation and Strategy of Description of Bruno Latour: How to Write Infra-reflexive Texts], Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 1: 186–217.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shirokov A.S. (2019) “Politika ob”iasneniia i strategiia opisaniia Bruno Latura: kak pisatʹ infrarefleksivnye teksty” [The Politics of Explanation and Strategy of Description of Bruno Latour: How to Write Infra-reflexive Texts], Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 1: 186–217.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sventsitsky, V. (2017) Dialogi [Dialogues]. M.: Otchii dom.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sventsitsky, V. (2017) Dialogi [Dialogues]. M.: Otchii dom.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Volf, M (1998) After Our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdemans.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volf, M (1998) After Our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdemans.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">White, L. (1967) “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis”, Science 155(3767): 1203–1207.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">White, L. (1967) “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis”, Science 155(3767): 1203–1207.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Whitehead, A.N. (1978) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected Edition. D.R. Griffin, D.W. Sherburne (eds.). New York: Free Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Whitehead, A.N. (1978) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected Edition. D.R. Griffin, D.W. Sherburne (eds.). New York: Free Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">World Council of the Churches (2013) The Church: Towards a Common Vision. WCC Publications.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">World Council of the Churches (2013) The Church: Towards a Common Vision. WCC Publications.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zizioulas J. (1997) Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. Crestwood, NY: SVS Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zizioulas J. (1997) Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. Crestwood, NY: SVS Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
