The Life-Giving Cross in the Godenovo Village: Between and Beyond the Two Sacred Centers
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-3-184-208
EDN: TSZMJZ
Abstract
The article discusses the veneration of a carved wooden crucifix kept in the church of St. John Chrysostom in Godenovo village. The cross, according to a legend, was revealed in 1423 to shepherds who saw him descending from the sky. According to the official version, the cross is of Byzantine origin and it appeared in Russia as a sign of the transition of spiritual grace from Constantinople to Moscow. A church was erected at the site where the cross has been revealed, then demolished in 1940, and the cross was transferred to the temple of a neighboring village, where it has been kept until today. In the 1990s, a monastery was built on the site of the cross discovery. The monastery declared its rights to possessing the cross. As a result, a confrontation between the two religious centers led to "doubling of the sacred” and conflicting claims for the appropriation of sacred power, understood as an emanation of the sacred power of the original Life-Giving Cross of the Lord. The cross and its copies keep a symbolic meaning of the Russian state building. The article draws upon official publications and field data.
About the Authors
Andrey Moroz
Higher School of Economics University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Eleonora Semivragova
Higher School of Economics University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Albert-Llorca, M. (2002) Les Vierges miraculeuses. Légendes et rituels. Paris.
2. Anastasova, E. (2007) “Letiashchaia ikona — semantika i funktsii odnoi legendy” [Flying icon—semantics and functions of a legend], Studia mythologica slavica X: 227–235.
3. Antonov, Dmitriy (2021) “Appropriation of Virtue: The Invisible ‘Body’ of Holy Objects in Christian Traditions”, Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom 39(3): 7-25.
4. Antonov D.I. (2018) “Dva ‘tela’ ikony: obshchenie s obrazom kak apropriatsiia sily” [Two “bodies” of an icon: communication with the image as an appropriation of power], Vestnik RGGU. Seriia: Istoriia. Filologiia. Kulʹturologiia. Vostokovedenie 7(40): 9–34.
5. Bessmertnaia, E.K. (2005) (ed) Velichaishaia sviatynia. Zhivotvoriashchii krest Gospodenʹ. Istoriia iavleniia i mnogovekovoe sluzhenie nashemu otechestvu [The greatest shrine. The life-giving cross of the Lord. The history of the phenomenon and the centuries-old service to our country]. Moscow: Algoritm.
6. Cohen, E. (1992) “Pilgrimage centers: Concentric and excentric”, Annals of Tourism Research 19(1): 33–50.
7. Coleman, S., Eade, J. (2004) “Introduction: Reframing Pilgrimage”, in S. Coleman, J. Eade (eds) Reframing Pilgrimage: Cultures in Motion, pp. 1–25. London, New York: Routledge.
8. Dubisch, J. (1995) In a Different Place: Pilgrimage, Gender and Politics in a Greek Island Shrine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Eade, J., Sallnow, M.J. (2000) “Introduction”, in J. Eade, M.J. Sallnow (eds) Contesting
10. the Sacred: The Anthropology of Christian Pilgrimage, pp. 1–50. Urbana; Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
11. Goriunova-Borisova, A. (ed.) (2014) Zhivotvoriashchii Krest Gospodenʹ v khrame sviatitelia Ioanna Zlatousta sela Godenova [The Life-giving Cross of the Lord in the Church of St. John Chrysostom in the village of Godenovo]. Pereslavskii Nikolʹskii zhenskii monastyrʹ.
12. Huerta, D.A. (2017) “The Death and Rebirth of a Crucifix: Materiality and the Sacred in Andean Vernacular Catholicism”, in M. Opas, A. Haapalainen (eds) Christianity and the Limits of Materiality, pp. 163 –183. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
13. Iavorskaia, S.L. (2006) “’Shumaevskii krest’ i kalʹvariia tsaria Alekseia Mikhailovicha”
14. [“Shumaevsky Cross” and Calvary of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich], in A.M. Lidov (ed), Ierotopiia. Sozdanie sakralʹnykh prostranstv v Vizantii i Drevnei Rusi, pp. 706–739. Moscow: Progress-traditsiia.
15. Kormina, Zh.V. (2003) “Peshcherka” [Cave], Zhivaia starina 1: 25–28.
16. Kormina, Zh.V. (2019) Palomniki: Etnograficheskie ocherki pravoslavnogo nomadizma [Pilgrims: Ethnographic Essays in Orthodox Nomadism]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki.
17. Krutova, M.S. (1997) Sviatitelʹ Nikolai Chudotvorets v drevnerusskoi pisʹmennosti [St. Nicolas the Miracle-Worker in Ancient Russian Literature]. Moscow: Martis.
18. Lidov, A.M. (2006) “Ierotopiia. Sozdanie sakralʹnykh prostranstv kak vid tvorchestva i predmet istoricheskogo issledovaniia” [Hierotopy. Creation of sacred spaces as a kind of creativity and a subject of historical research], in A.M. Lidov (ed) Ierotopiia. Sozdanie sakralʹnykh prostranstv v Vizantii i Drevnei Rusi, pp. 9–31. Moscow: Progress-traditsiia.
19. Lotman, Iu.M., Uspenskii, B.A. (1994) “Otzvuki kontseptsii ‘Moskva Tretii Rim’ v ideologii Petra I” [Echoes of the concept “Moscow — the Third Rome” in the ideology of Peter I], in Uspenskii B.A. Izbrannye trudy. Vol. 1. Semiotika kulʹtury. Semiotika istorii, pp. 60–74. Moscow: Gnozis.
20. Moroz, A.B. (2017) Narodnaia agiografiia: istochniki, siuzhety, obrazy [Folk hagiography:
21. sources, plots, characters]. Moscow: Neolit.
22. Moroz, A.B. (2001) “Severnorusskie pastusheskie otpuska i magiia pervogo vygona skota u slavian” [Northern Russian shepherd’s charms and the magic of the first pasture of cattle among the Slavs], in Vostochnoslavianskii ėtnolingvisticheskii sbornik, pp. 232–258. Moscow: Indrik. “Nabliudenie puteshestvennika po Rostovskomu uezdu” [Traveler’s observation of the Rostov district] (1848), in Iaroslavskie gubernskie vedomosti 35 (Chastʹ neofitsialʹnaia): 176–180.
23. Ousterhout, R. (2006) “Sacred Geographies and Holy Cities: Constantinople as Jerusalem”, in A.M. Lidov (ed.) Ierotopiia. Sozdanie sakralʹnykh prostranstv v Vizantii i Drevnei Rusi, pp. 98–116. Moscow: Progress-traditsiia.
24. Panchenko, A.A. (1998) Issledovaniia v oblasti narodnogo pravoslaviia. Derevenskii sviatyni Severo-Zapada Rossii [Research in the field of folk Orthodoxy. Rural shrine of Northwest Russia]. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteiia.
25. Primiano, L.N. (1995) “Vernacular Religion and the Search for Method in Religious Folklife”, Western Folklore 54(1): 37–56.
26. Putsko, V.G. (2002) “Iisusov krest iz Nikolʹskogo pogosta (okolo 1467 g.). Skulʹpturnoe raspiatie v russkom plasticheskom iskusstve” [Jesus Cross from Nikolsky churchyard (about 1467). Sculptural crucifixion in Russian plastic art], Soobshcheniia Rostovskogo muzeia. Vyp. XII: 268–277.
27. Ranchin, A.M. (2012) “K istolkovaniiu teorii ‘Moskva — Tretii Rim’ v russkoi kulʹture Novogo vremeni” [To the interpretation of the theory “Moscow — the Third Rome” in the Russian culture of modern times], Rossiia XXI 6: 26–57.
28. Rudi, T.R. (2004) “’Iako stolp nepokolebim’ (ob odnom agiograficheskom topose)” [“Unshakable like a pillar” (about one hagiographic topos)], in Trudy otdela drevnerusskoi literatury. Institut russkoi literatury (Pushkinskii Dom). Vyp. 55, pp. 211–227. Saint-Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin.
29. Skazanie o iavlenii chestnago i zhivotvoriashchago kresta Gospodnia i velikago vo sviatitelekh chudotvortsa Nikolaia v Nikolʹskom pogoste, chto slovet na bolote u Iisusova kresta i o blagodatnykh znameniiakh i chudesnykh istseleniiakh ot zhivotvoriashchago kresta Gospodnia i sviatitelia i chudotvortsa Nikolaia [The story about the appearance of the Honest and Life-Giving Cross of the Lord and the great Miracle-Worker Nicholas in the St. Nicholas Pogost in the swamp near the Jesus Cross and about the blessed signs and miraculous healings from the Life-Giving Cross of the Lord and the saint and Miracle-Worker Nicholas] (1874). Izd. V.P. Ekhlakova. Iaroslavlʹ.
30. Trushkov, S.A. (2017) “Teoretiko-pravovye aspekty vkliucheniia polozhenii kontseptsii ‘Moskva — Tretii Rim’ v gosudarstvennuiu ideologiiu sovremennoi Rossii” [Theoretical and legal aspects of the inclusion of the provisions of the concept “Moscow — the Third Rome” in the state ideology of modern Russia], in Obshchestvo. Nauka. Innovatsii (NPK-2017). Sbornik statei. Vserossiiskaia ezhegodnaia nauchno-prakticheskaia konferentsiia, pp. 6089–6094. Viatka: Viatskii gosudarstvennyi
31. universitet.
32. Vagner, G.K. (1980) Ot simvola k realʹnosti. Razvitie plasticheskogo obraza v russkom
33. iskusstve XIV–XV vekov [From symbol to reality. Development of the plastic im age in Russian art of the XIV–XV centuries]. Moscow: Iskusstvo.
Review
For citations:
Moroz A., Semivragova E. The Life-Giving Cross in the Godenovo Village: Between and Beyond the Two Sacred Centers. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2021;39(3):184-208. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-3-184-208. EDN: TSZMJZ
Views:
1
Email this article 