Bioethical Issues of In Vitro Fertilization in Russian Orthodox Debates
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-4-142-168
EDN: CWVVAV
Abstract
An increasing number of Orthodox Christians are turning to methods of assisted reproduction. However, the ambivalent position of the “Basis of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church” (2000) does not give believers clear ethical guidelines as to which reproductive methods are acceptable. In addition, the one-sided interpretation of the “Basis” led to a complete rejection of in vitro fertilization (IVF). The Church's commission “Intercouncil Presence” has developed a draft document that aims to clarify the ambiguous position of the “Basis” regarding reproductive technologies. In February 2021, the draft document, “Ethical issues related to in vitro fertilization,” was published on the Church’s official website. This paper analyzes the discussions that took place both before and after the publication. The author shows that IVF opponents do not understand the problem under discussion, using irrelevant, selective data that do not reflect the real state of medical practice to con firm their arguments. Analyzing the objections, the author shows that the death of embryos during IVF occurs due to natural causes, and therefore cannot be equated with murder. It is also argued that the level of congenital pathology in children remains at the level of a fraction of a percent and therefore cannot make IVF ethically unacceptable. Also, the article challenges concerns about the harm that IVF causes to pregnant women. Besides, the article reflects publications showing the possibility of the practical application of the published draft document.
About the Author
Roman Tarabrin
First Moscow State Medical University; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Aksenov I., prot. (2017) “Progress i chelovecheskoe dostoinstvo. Eticheskie voprosy sovremennykh vspomogatelʹnykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologii” [Progress and Human Dignity. Ethical Issues in Modern Assisted Reproductive Technologies], in Pravoslavie i problemy bioėtiki, pp. 401–422. Moscow [http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/4801677.html, accessed on 21.08.2021].
2. Barbuscia, A, Mills, MC. (2017) “Cognitive development in children up to age 11 years bornьafter ART—a longitudinal cohort study”, Human Reproduction 32(7): 1482–1488.
3. Boyarskyi, K.Yu, et al (2019) “Sravnitel’naia otsenka effektivnosti razlichnykh variantov estestvennogo tsikla i ovarial’noi stimuliatsii pri provedenii programmy EKO/IKSI u patsientok s besplodiem” [Сomparative evaluation of efficiency of different variants of the natural cycle and ovarian stimulation during IVF/ICSI programs in patients with infertility], Problemy Reproduktsii 25(1): 41–48.
4. Brinton, L.A., et al (2013) “In vitro fertilization and risk of breast and gynecologic cancers: a retrospective cohort study within the Israeli Maccabi Healthcare Services”, Fertility and Sterility 99(5): 1189–1196.
5. Chard, T. (1991) “Frequency of implantation and early pregnancy loss in natural cycles”, Baillière’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 5(1): 179–189.
6. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: Instruction on Respect for Human Life in its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation Replies to Certain Questions of the Day Vatican City (1987). [https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html, accessed on 21.08.2021]
7. Dukhovich, V., sviashch., Molchanov, A.Iu. (2013) Nachalo zhizni i vnutriutrobnoe razvitie cheloveka: ot biologii k bioėtike [The Beginning of Life and Human Intrauterine Development: From Biology to Bioethics]. M.: Lepta-kniga.
8. Dunson, D.B. (2002) “Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle”, Human Reproduction 17(5): 1399–1403.
9. Edwards, R. G., Bavister, B.D., Steptoe, P.C (1969) “Early Stages of Fertilization in vitro of Human Oocytes Matured in vitro”, Nature 221(5181): 632–635.
10. Edwards, R.G., Steptoe, P.C. (1980) A Matter of Life: The Story of a Medical Breakthrough. London: Hutchinson.
11. Engelhardt, H.T. (2000) The Foundations of Christian Bioethics. Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger publishers. Engelhardt, H.T. The Foundations of Christian Bioethics, pp. 261–262
12. Ghazi, H.A., et al. (1991) “Delivery outcome after infertility—a registry study”, Fertility and Sterility 55(4): 726–32.
13. Iltis, A. S., Cherry, M. J. (2015) “Bioethics and the Family: Family Building in the TwentyFirst Century”, Christian Bioethics 21(2): 135–143.
14. Kirill (Gundiaev), patr. (2000) Norma very kak norma zhizni. Problema sootnosheniia mezhdu traditsionnymi i liberalʹnymi tsennostiami v vybore lichnosti i obshchestva [Norm of Faith as a Norm of Life. The Problem of the Relationship between Traditional and Liberal Values in the Choice of Individuals and Society] (Paper presented at the Theological conference «Pravoslavnoe bogoslovie na poroge tret’ego tysjacheletiia», Moscow, 7–9 February 2000 г.) [http://www.odinblago.ru/
15. svoboda_i_otvetstvennost/4, accessed on 21.08.2021].
16. Sallam, H. N., Sallam, N. H. (2016) "Religious aspects of assisted reproduction. Facts, views vision", ObGyn 8(1): 33-48.
17. Schicktanz, S., et al. (2011) "The ethics of 'public understanding of ethics' - why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients' voices", Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15(2): 129-139.
18. Solomon, M. (2005) "Realizing Bioethics' Goals in Practice: Ten Ways 'Is' Can Help 'Ought'", The Hastings Center Report 35(4): 40-47.
19. Spaan, M., et al. (2019) "Risk of cancer in children and young adults conceived by assisted reproductive technology", Human Reproduction 34(4): 740-750.
20. Stewart, L. M., et al. (2013) "In vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk of borderline ovarian tumours", Gynecologic Oncology 129(2): 372-376.
21. Sutton, A. (2015) "Who Is My Mother and Who Are My Brothers?", Christian Bioethics 21(2): 166-180.
22. Tarabrin, R. (2020) "Orthodox Perspectives on In Vitro Fertilization in Russia", Christian bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality 26(2): 177-204.
23. The Holy Synod of the Church of Greece (2007) Bioethics Committee, Basic positions on the ethics of Assisted Reproduction. Athens.
24. Webster, A., Schuh, M. (2017) "Mechanisms of Aneuploidy in Human Eggs", Trends in Cell Biology 27(1): 55-68.
25. Wen, J., et al. (2012) "Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis", Fertility and Sterility 97(6): 1331-1337.e4.
26. West, C. C. (2002) "The Russian Orthodox Church and Social Doctrine: A Commentary on Fundamentals of the Social Conception of the Russian Orthodox Church", Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe 22(2), Article 3 [https://digitalcom-mons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol22/iss2/3, accessed on 15.11.2021].
27. Whittemore, A. S. et al. (1992) "Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: Collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies: II. Invasive epithelial ovarian cancers in white women", American Journal of Epidemiology 136(10): 1184-1203.
28. Yang, M., Fan, X-B, Wu, J-N, Wang, J-M. (2018) "Association of assisted reproductive technology and multiple pregnancies with the risks of birth defects and stillbirth: A retrospective cohort study", Scientific Reports 8(1).
29. Zhao, J., et al. (2018) "Do the children born after assisted reproductive technology have an increased risk of birth defects? A systematic review and meta-analysis", The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 33(2): 322-333.
30. Korneeva, I. E. et al. (2004) “Sindrom giperstimuliatsii iaichnikov: profilaktika, diagnostika, lechenie (obzor literatury)” [Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment (Literature Review)], Problemy reproduktsii 1 [http://www.mediasphera.ru/journals/reproduction/272/, accessed on 21.08.2021].
31. Kostiuk, K. N. (2001) “Vozniknovenie sotsialʹnoi doktriny Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi” [The emergence of the social doctrine of the Russian Orthodox Church], Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennostʹ 6: 114–131.
32. Kubar, O., Yudin, B. (2015) “Bioethics in Russia: History and Present-day Problems”, Asian Bioethics Review 7(5): 481–490.
33. Kyrlezhev, A. (2000) “Tserkovʹ i mir v sotsialʹnoi kontseptsii Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi” [The Church and the World in the Social Conception of the Russian Orthodox Church], Russkaia myslʹ 4334: 20.
34. Kyrlezhev, A. (2003) “Pravoslavie na eksport” [Orthodoxy for Export], NG-Religii. 05.03.2003 [https://www.ng.ru/ng_religii/2003-03-05/8_eport.html, accessed on 21.08.2021].
35. Lambert, R.D. (2003) “Safety issues in assisted reproductive technology: Aetiology of health problems in singleton ART babies”, Human Reproduction 18(10): 1987–1991.
36. Liaush L.B. (2017) “Eticheskie aspekty vspomogatelʹnykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologii” [Ethical Aspects of Assisted Reproductive Technologies], in Pravoslavie i problemy bioetiki, pp. 428–440. Moscow [http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/4801677.html, accessed on 21.08.2021].
37. Loya, J.O.S.A. (2002) “Roman Catholic and Russian Orthodox Ethics: On Globalization”, Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe 22(2), Article 4. [https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol22/iss2/4, accessed on 15.11.2021].
38. Macklon, N.S., Geraedts, J.P.M., Fauser, B.C.J.M. (2002) “Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the ‘black box’ of early pregnancy loss”, Human Reproduction Update 8(4): 333–343.
39. Mascarenhas, M.N., et al. (2012) “National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys”, PLOS Medicine 9(12): e1001356.
40. Melkhisedek (Artiukhin), arkhimandrit. (2021) “Medikalizatsiia grekha i iskusstvennoe oplodotvorenie” [The Medicalization of Sin and Artificial Insemination], in Pravoslavie i problemy bioetiki, pp. 383–391 M. [https://cosb-mp.ru/dokumenty/tserkovno-obshchestvennogo-soveta-po-bioetike/sbornik-pravoslavie-i-problemy-bioetiki-3, accessed on 21.08.2021].
41. Mezhsobornoe Prisutstvie Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi (2021) “Proekt dokumenta “Eticheskie problemy, sviazannye s metodom Ekstrakorporalʹnogo oplodotvoreniia”” [Draft document “Ethical Problems Associated to the In Vitro Fertilization] [https://msobor.ru/document/52, accessed on 21.08.2021].
42. Min Yang, et al. (2018). “Association of assisted reproductive technology and multiple pregnancies with the risks of birth defects and stillbirth: A retrospective cohort study”, Scientific Reports 8(1):8296.
43. Munné, S., et al. (2019) “First PGT-A using human in vivo blastocysts recovered by uterine lavage: comparison with matched IVF embryo controls”, Human Reproduction 35(1): 70–80.
44. Nagaoka, S.I., Hassold, T.J., Hunt, P.A. (2012) “Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem”, Nature Reviews Genetics 13(7): 493–504.
45. Osnovy sotsial’noi kontseptsii Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi [Fundamentals of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church].
46. Pelinck, M. J., et al. (2007) “Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study”, Human Reproduction 22(9): 2463–2470.
47. Pinborg, A. (2004) “Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10 362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000”, Human Reproduction 19(2): 435–441.
48. Pravoslavie i problemy bioetiki [Orthodoxy and Bioethical Issues] (2017). Moscow [http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/4801677.html, accessed on 01.04.2021].
49. Richter, K. (2013) The Post-Soviet Russian Orthodox Church. London New York: Routledge.
50. Roberts, C. J., Lowe, C. R. (1975) “Where have all the Conceptions Gone?”, in T.V.N. Persaud (ed.) Problems of Birth Defects, pp. 148–150. Springer.
51. Rossing, M.A., et al. (1994) “Ovarian tumors in a cohort of infertile women”, New England Journal of Medicine 331(12): 771–776.
52. Saarinen, R., Arola, P. (2002) “In search of sobornost and ‘new symphony’: The social doctrine of the Russian Orthodox Church”, Ecumenical Review 54: 130–141.
53. Sallam, H.N., Sallam, N.H. (2016) “Religious aspects of assisted reproduction. Facts, views vision”, ObGyn 8(1): 33–48.
54. Schicktanz, S., et al. (2011) “The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15(2): 129–139.
55. Sgrechcha, E., Tambone, V. (2002) “Bioetika. Uchebnik” [Bioethics. Textbook]. Bibleisko bogoslovskii institut sv. apostola Andreia.
56. Shok, N. (2020) “Ot bioetiki svetskoi k bioetike khristianskoi: o znachenii naslediia Kh. Tristrama Engel’gardta v Rossii” [From ‘Bioethics’ to ‘Christian Bioethics’: Significance of H.T. Engelhardt’s Legacy in Today’s Russia], Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom 38(4): 7–43.
57. Siluianova, I.V. (2001) Etika vrachevaniia. Sovremennaia meditsina i pravoslavie [The Ethics of Medicine. Modern Medicine and Orthodoxy]. M: Izdatelʹstvo podvorʹia Sviato-Troitskoi Sergievoi Lavry.
58. Solomon, M. (2005) “Realizing Bioethics’ Goals in Practice: Ten Ways ‘Is’ Can Help ‘Ought’”, The Hastings Center Report 35(4): 40–47.
59. Spaan, M., et al. (2019) “Risk of cancer in children and young adults conceived by assisted reproductive technology”, Human Reproduction 34(4): 740–750.
60. Stewart, L.M., et al. (2013) “In vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk of borderline ovarian tumours”, Gynecologic Oncology 129(2): 372–376.
61. Sutton, A. (2015) “Who Is My Mother and Who Are My Brothers?”, Christian Bioethics 21(2): 166–180.
62. Tarabrin, R. (2020) “Eticheskie dilemmy surrogatnogo materinstva: khristianskii diskurs v sovremennom sotsiokul’turnom kontekste” [Ethical Dilemmas of Surrogacy: Christian Discourse in Contemporary Socio-Cultural Context], Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom 38(4): 123–144.
Review
For citations:
Tarabrin R. Bioethical Issues of In Vitro Fertilization in Russian Orthodox Debates. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2021;39(4):142-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-4-142-168. EDN: CWVVAV
Views:
30
Email this article 