Talking about the Sacred
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2024-42-4-7-21
Abstract
The introductory paper deals with theoretical issues related to the study of ritual and the sacred in secular and post‑secular cultures. Social research in recent decades shows that the unambiguous opposition between religion and secularism is not quite workable as a socio‑historical concept, and that perceptions of the sacred in modern societies turn out to be dynamic and contradictory in their own way. The articles collected focus on various anthropological aspects of the production of the sacred in Russia in the second half of the 20th and early 21st centuries. The results of these studies allow making several general observations. First, we observe a very dynamic picture of the processes of sacralisation and ritualisation in various segments of everyday life. Secondly, in present day culture, personalised ritual agents are gradually losing their status and generally giving way to impersonal (and accordingly poorly controlled) forces. Thirdly, the types of sacralisation observed in contemporary society are related to the formation of a new ontology that blurs the boundaries between natural, social and moral order.
Supporting agencies: Supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, project No 21-18-00508, https://rscf.ru/en/project/21-18-00508/
About the Author
A. А. Panchenko
European University in St. Petersburg; Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander А. Panchenko — Professor; Leading Research Fellow
St. Petersburg
References
1. Буайе П. Объясняя религию: Природа религиозного мышления / Пер. с фр. М.: Альпина нон-фикшн, 2017.
2. Глебкин В. В. Ритуал в советской культуре. М.: «Янус-К», 1998.
3. Гофман Э. Ритуал взаимодействия. Очерки поведения лицом к лицу / Пер. с англ.; под ред. Н. Н. Богомоловой, Д. А. Леонтьева. М.: Смысл, 2009.
4. Дюркгейм Э. Элементарные формы религиозной жизни: тотемическая система в Австралии / Пер. с фр. А. Апполонова и Т. Котельниковой; под науч. ред. А. Апполонова. М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2018.
5. Мосс М. Социальные функции священного. Избранные произведения. / Пер. с фр. под общей редакцией И. В. Утехина. Сост. В. Ю. Трофимов. СПб.: «Евразия», 2000.
6. Тернер В. Символ и ритуал / Сост. В. А. Бей лис. М.: Главная редакция восточной литературы издательства «Наука», 1983.
7. Узланер Д. А. Постсекулярный поворот. Как мыслить о религии в XXI веке. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара, 2020.
8. Asad, T. et al. (2009) Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Balkenhol, M., van den Hemel, E., Stengs, I. (eds.) (2020) The Secular Sacred: Emotions of Belonging and the Perils of Nation and Religion. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Beaumont, J. (ed.) (2018) The Routledge Handbook of Postsecularity. New York: Routledge.
11. Bell, C. (1992) Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Bellah, R. N. (1967) “Civil Religion in America”, Dædalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 96(1): 1–21.
13. Bernstein, A. (2014) “Caution, Religion! Iconoclasm, Secularism, and Ways of Seeing in Post-Soviet Art Wars”, Public Culture 26(3): 419–448.
14. Boyer, P., Liénard, P. (2006) “Why Ritualized Behavior? Precaution Systems and Action Parsing in Developmental, Pathological and Cultural Rituals”, Behavioral And Brain Sciences 29: 1–56.
15. Boyer, P., Liénard, P. (2006) “Whence Collective Rituals? A Cultural Selection Model of Ritualized Behavior”, American Anthropologist 108(4): 814–827.
16. Collins, R. (2004) Interaction Chain Rituals. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
17. Favret-Saada, J. (2016) “An Anthropology of Religious Polemics: The Case of Blasphemy Affairs”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1): 29–45.
18. Rosenwein, B. H. (2006) Emotional Communities in the Early Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
19. Sørensen, J. (2007) “Acts That Work: A Cognitive Approach to Ritual Agency”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion19: 281–300.
Review
For citations:
Panchenko A.А. Talking about the Sacred. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2024;42(4):7-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2024-42-4-7-21
Views:
232
Email this article 