Martyrs or Laborers? Sources and Scholarship on Circumcellions
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2022-40-1-38-57
Abstract
The issue (or even the riddle) of Circumcellions, rebels and persecutors of Roman landowners and Catholic priests, had long attracted the scholarly attention. Deriving their views from the writings of Optate, Augustine and later authors, and also from a fragment of the Theodosian Code, modern historians perceive Circumcellions in different ways. Their treatment depends much on their actual research field and their source priority. For example, Ch. Saumagne, preferring the legal source, considered Circumcellions as a certain social group — agricultural wage laborers; some later scholars, like T. Büttner and E. Tengström, based their research on the same concept. Others regarded Circumcellions as an issue of the Church history and precisely of the Donatist schism (W. H. C. Frend). Modern historians view the stories of Optate and Augustine from more unexpected perspective: as a form of rural Christianity (L. Dossey) and popular asceticism (B. Pottier). B. Shaw made an attempt to revive Saumagne’s theory. Today our notion of Circumcellions is more complex. They seem to be a certain mixture of lower‑class rural population and a certain form of popular Christianity, manifesting itself in ways proper for that crowd: asceticism, martyrdom, and “righteous” violence.
Keywords
About the Author
A. Mamontov
State Educational Institution Gymnasium No. 49
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey Mamontov — History Teacher
St. Petersburg
References
1. Букин М. А. К вопросу о причинах продолжительной жизнеспособности донатистского раскола // Христианское чтение. 2021. № 3. С. 232–242.
2. Ведешкин М. А. «Люди в черном»: христианские монахи в зеркале языческой критики // Вестник древней истории. 2019. № 79(2). С. 358–378.
3. Дилигенский Г. Г. Северная Африка в IV–V веках. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1961.
4. Дмитрев А. Д. К вопросу об агонистиках и циркумцеллионах // Вестник древней истории. 1948. № 3. С. 66–78.
5. Каргальцев А. В. Мученичество Святых Максимы, Секунды и Донатиллы. Вступительная статья, перевод и комментарий // Мнемон. Исследования и публикации по истории античного мира. Вып. 14. 2014. С. 455–464.
6. Мамонтов А. Л. Времена Юлиана Отступника в антидонатистской полемике Оптата из Милевы // Память и идентичность: особенности историописания в Античности, в Средние века и раннее Новое время. М.: РГГУ, 2019. С. 87–100.
7. Мамонтов А. Л. Константин и донатистский раскол: первые шаги императора (313–314 гг.) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2019. № 86. С. 9–24.
8. Мамонтов А. Л. Преследование донатистов при императоре Константе (337–350 гг.) // Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология. 2018. № 22. С. 830–842.
9. Машкин Н. А. Агонистики или циркумцеллионы в кодексе Феодосия // Вестник древней истории. 1938. № 1. С. 82–92.
10. Машкин Н. А. Движение агонистиков (из истории Римской Африки IV в.) // Историк-марксист. 1935. № 41 (4). С. 28–52.
11. Машкин Н. А. К вопросу о революционном движении рабов и колонов в Римской Африке // Вестник древней истории. 1949. № 3. С. 51–61.
12. Ранние мученичества. Переводы, комментарии, исследования / пер., комм., вступ. ст., прилож. и общ. ред. А. Д. Пантелеева. СПб.: ИЦ «Гуманитарная Академия», 2017.
13. Alexander, J. (1998) “Count Taurinus and the Persecutors of Donatism”, Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 2: 247–267.
14. Barnes, T. D. (1975) “The Beginnings of Donatism”, The Journal of Theological Studies 26(1): 13–22.
15. Brisson, J.-P. (1958) Autonomisme et christianisme dans l’Afrique romaine de Septime Sévère à l’invasion vandale. Paris: E. de Boccard.
16. Bukin, M. A. (2021) “K voprosu o prichinakh prodolzhitelʹnoi zhiznesposobnosti donatistskogo raskola” [On the Reasons for the Long Vitality of the Donatist Schism], Khristianskoe chtenie 3: 232–242.
17. Büttner, T. (1959) “Die Circumcellionen — eine social-religiöse Bewegung”, in Büttner T., Werner E. Circumcellionen und Adamiten. Zwei Formen mittelalterlicher Haeresie, S. 1–72. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
18. Diesner, H.-J. (1964) “Methodisches und Sachliches zum Circumcellionentum”, in Kirche und Staat im spätrömischen Reich: Aufsätze zur Spätantike and zur Geschichte der alten Kirche, S. 53–77. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.
19. Diligenskii, G. G. (1961) Severnaia Afrika v IV–V vekakh [North Africa in the IV–V centuries]. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR.
20. Dmitrev, A. D. (1948) “K voprosu ob agonistikakh i tsirkumtsellionakh” [To a question on agonists and circumcillions], Vestnik drevnei istorii 3: 66–78.
21. Dossey, L. (2010) Peasant and Empire in Christian North Africa. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.
22. Frend, W. H. C. (1969) “Circumcellions and Monks”, The Journal of Theological Studies 20(2): 542–549.
23. Frend, W. H. C. (1971) The Donatist Church: A Movement of Protest in Roman North Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
24. Grey, C. (2016) “Rural society in North Africa”, in R. Miles (ed.) The Donatist Schism: Controversy and Contexts, pp. 120–141. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
25. Hahn, T. (1900) Tyconius-Studien. Leipzig: Dieterich.
26. Hogrefe, А. (2009) Umstrittene Vergangenheit: Historische Argumente in der Auseinandersetzung Augustins mit den Donatisten. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
27. Jones, A. H. M., Martindale, J. R., Morris, J. (1971) The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kargalʹtsev, A. V. (2014) “Muchenichestvo Sviatykh Maksimy, Sekundy i Donatilly. Vstupitelʹnaia statʹia, perevod i kommentarii” [Martyrdom of Saints Maxima, Secunda and Donatilla. Introduction, translation and commentary], Mnemon. Issledovaniia i publikatsii po istorii antichnogo mira 14: 455–464.
29. Koch, H. (1932) “Die ps.-cyprianische Schrift De centesima, sexagesima, tricesima in ihrer Abhängigkeit von Cyprian”, Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Älteren Kirche 31: 248–272.
30. Mamontov, A. L. (2019) “Konstantin i donatistskii raskol: pervye shagi imperatora (313–314 gg.)” [Constantine and the Donatist schism: the emperor’s first steps (313– 314)], Vestnik PSTGU, Seriia II: Istoriia, Istoriia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi 86: 9–24.
31. Mamontov, A. L. (2018) “Presledovanie donatistov pri imperatore Konstante (337–350 gg.)” [Persecution of the Donatists under Emperor Constantius (337–350)], Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia 22: 830–842.
32. Mamontov, A. L. (2019) “Vremena Iuliana Otstupnika v antidonatistskoi polemike Optata iz Milevy” [The Times of Julian the Apostate in the Anti-Donatist Polemic of Optatus of Mileva], in Pamiatʹ i identichnostʹ: osobennosti istoriopisaniia v Antichnosti, v Srednie veka i rannee Novoe vremia, pp. 87–100. M.: RGGU.
33. Martroye, F. (1904) “Une tentative de revolution sociale en Afrique: donatistes et circoncellions”, Revue des questions historiques 36(76): 353–416.
34. Mashkin, N. A. (1938) “Agonistiki ili tsirkumtselliony v kodekse Feodosiia” [Agonistics or Circumcellions in the Theodosius Codex], Vestnik drevnei istorii 1: 82–92.
35. Mashkin N. A. (1935) “Dvizhenie agonistikov (iz istorii Rimskoi Afriki IV v.)” [Movement of agonists (from the history of Roman Africa in IV century)], Istorik-marksist 41(1): 28–52.
36. Mashkin N. A. (1949) “K voprosu o revoliutsionnom dvizhenii rabov i kolonov v Rimskoi Afrike” [On the revolutionary movement of slaves and colonies in Roman Africa], Vestnik drevnei istorii 3: 51–61.
37. Monceaux, P. (1920). Histoire littéraire de l’Afrique chrétienne depuis les origines jusqu’à l’invasion arabe. Vol. 4. Paris: Leroux.
38. Panteleev, A. D. (ed.) (2017) Rannie muchenichestva. Perevody, kommentarii, issledovaniia [Early Martyrdoms. The Early Martyrdoms of the Early Martyrs. translations, commentaries, studies]. St. Petersburg: PС Gumanitarnaya Akademiya.
39. Pottier, B. (2016) “Circumcelliones, Rural Society and Communal Violence in Late Antique North Africa”, in R. Miles (ed.) The Donatist Schism: Controversy and Contexts, pp. 142–165. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
40. Pottier, B. (2008) “Les circoncellions. Un mouvement ascétique itinérant dans l’Afrique du Nord des IVe et Ve siècles”, Antiquités africaines 44: 43–107.
41. Rubin, Z. (1994) “Mass Movements in Late Antiquity — Appearances and Realities”, in I. Malkin, Z. W. Rubinsohn (eds) Leaders and Masses in the Roman World: Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz, pp. 129–187. Leiden: Brill.
42. Saumagne, C. (1934) “Ouvriers agricoles ou rôdeurs de celliers: les circoncellions Afrique”, Annales histoire économique et sociale 6: 355–364.
43. Shaw, B. D. (2011) Sacred Violence: African Christians and Sectarian Hatred in the Age of Augustine. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Shaw, B. D. (2004) “Who Were the Circumcellions?”, in A. H. Merrills (ed.) Vandals, Romans and Berbers: New Perspectives on Late Antique North Africa, pp. 227–258. Aldershot: Ashgate.
45. Tengström, E. (1964) Donatisten und Katholiken: soziale, wirtschaftliche und politische Aspekte einer nordafrikanischen Kirchenspaltung. Göteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.
46. Vedeshkin, M. A. (2019) “Liudi v chernom”: khristianskie monakhi v zerkale iazycheskoi kritiki” [“People in Black”: Christian monks in the mirror of pagan criticism], Vestnik drevnei istorii 79(2): 358–378.
47. Warmington, B. H. (1954) The North African Provinces from Diocletian to the Vandal Conquest. Cambridge: University Press.
Review
For citations:
Mamontov A. Martyrs or Laborers? Sources and Scholarship on Circumcellions. State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide. 2022;40(1):38-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2022-40-1-38-57
Views:
78
Email this article 