<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">religion</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2073-7203</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2073-7211</issn><publisher><publisher-name>РАНХиГС</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-2-38-60</article-id><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">UDAEXN</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">religion-322</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>От creatio ex nihilo к creatio ex profundis: переосмысление доктрины творения в постметафизической теологии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>From creatio ex nihilo to creatio ex profundis: Rethinking the Doctrine of Creation in Postmetaphysical Theology</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коначева</surname><given-names>Светлана</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Konacheva</surname><given-names>Svetlana</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">konacheva@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Российский государственный гуманитарный университет<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Russian State University for the Humanities<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>38</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Коначева С., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Коначева С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Konacheva S.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://religion.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/322">https://religion.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/322</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются особенности методов контекстуальной теологии на примере переосмысления традиционной доктрины творения в постметафизической теологии. Анализ работ Кэтрин Келлер (феминистская теология) и Джона Капуто (теология события) демонстрирует, что творение осмысляется в контексте попыток преодолеть властный дискурс и отделить идею божественного от властного суверенитета. В рамках постмодерной тео-поэтики творение понимается не как превращение из ничего в нечто, а скорее как преобразования тьмы и глубины. Предполагается, что концепция творения ex nihilo связана с греческими философскими концепциями всемогущества, которые отвергают хаос и женственность ради патриархального, удаленного, могущественного Божества. В подобном контексте Келлер и Капуто отказываются от традиционной доктрины творения ex nihilo в пользу творения exprofundis или ex amore. В их истолковании библейский нарратив свидетельствует не о единственной чистой силе, действующей ex nihilo, но о совокупности сил, одна из которых предстает как активная и формирующая, а другая - как более открытая, подвижная и несформированная. Тем самым постмодерная теология акцентирует поэтическое становление и стремится подорвать гипермаскулинность. Теологическая герменевтика в своем стремлении разрушить божественный суверенитет деконструирует тем самым и традиционный монотеизм. Она пытается показать, что религия в постмодерном мире - это способ бытия-в-мире.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the rethinking of the traditional doctrine of creation in postmetaphysical theology, which is seen as an example of contextual theology. An analysis of the works of Catherine Keller (feminist theology) and John Caputo (theology of event) demonstrates that creation is reinterpreted in the context of attempts to overcome the power discourse and dissociate the idea of the divine from the idea of sovereignty. The creation, in this postmodern the-opoetics, is understood not as a move from nothing into something, but rather as a transformation of darkness and depth. The concept of creation ex nihilo is related to Greek philosophical concepts of omnipotence, which reject the primordial chaos and the feminine in favor of a powerful patriarchal deity. In this context, Keller and Caputo transform the traditional doctrine of creation ex nihilo into creation ex profundis or ex amore. In their interpretation, the biblical narrative doesn’t describe a single pure force acting ex nihilo, but an ensemble offorces, one of which appears as active and formative, and the other as more open, mobile and unformed. Thus, in postmodern theology, we have an emphasis on poetic becoming and the rejection of a hypermasculine, powerful God. We argue that theological hermeneutics, in its effort to destroy divine sovereignty, also deconstructs traditional monotheism. This theology tries to show that religion in the postmodern world is a way of being-in-the-world.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>контекстуальная теология</kwd><kwd>теопоэтика</kwd><kwd>творение</kwd><kwd>власть</kwd><kwd>суверенитет</kwd><kwd>слабость</kwd><kwd>Кэтрин Келлер</kwd><kwd>Джон Капуто</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>contextual theology</kwd><kwd>theopoetics</kwd><kwd>creation</kwd><kwd>power</kwd><kwd>sovereignty</kwd><kwd>weakness</kwd><kwd>Catherine Keller</kwd><kwd>John Caputo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бадью А. Делез. "Шум бытия" / пер. с фр. Д. Скопина. М.: Логос-Альтера, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Бадью А. Делез. "Шум бытия" / пер. с фр. Д. Скопина. М.: Логос-Альтера, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Agamben, G. (2000) "Absolute Immanence", in Agamben G. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Agamben, G. (2000) "Absolute Immanence", in Agamben G. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Badiou, A. (2004) Deleuze. "Shum bytiia" [Deleuze: The Clamor of Being]. M.: Logos-Al'tera.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Badiou, A. (2004) Deleuze. "Shum bytiia" [Deleuze: The Clamor of Being]. M.: Logos-Al'tera.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bevans, S.B. (2018) Essays in Contextual Theology. Leiden, Boston: Brill.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bevans, S.B. (2018) Essays in Contextual Theology. Leiden, Boston: Brill.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caputo, J.D. (2019) Cross and Cosmos: A Theology of Difficult Glory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caputo, J.D. (2019) Cross and Cosmos: A Theology of Difficult Glory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caputo, J.D. (2018) Hermeneutics. Facts and Interpretation in the Age of Information. A Pelican Book.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caputo, J.D. (2018) Hermeneutics. Facts and Interpretation in the Age of Information. A Pelican Book.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caputo, J.D. (1987) Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caputo, J.D. (1987) Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caputo J.D. (2015) The Folly of God: A Theology of the Unconditional. Polebridge Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caputo J.D. (2015) The Folly of God: A Theology of the Unconditional. Polebridge Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caputo J.D. (2013) The Insistence of God: A Theology of Perhaps. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caputo J.D. (2013) The Insistence of God: A Theology of Perhaps. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caputo, J.D. (2006) The Weakness of God: A Theology of the Event. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caputo, J.D. (2006) The Weakness of God: A Theology of the Event. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caputo, J.D. (2006) "Without Sovereignty, Without Being: Conditionality, the Coming God, and Derrida's Democracy to Come", in Cl. Crockett (ed.) Religion and Violence in a Secular World, pp. 137-156. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caputo, J.D. (2006) "Without Sovereignty, Without Being: Conditionality, the Coming God, and Derrida's Democracy to Come", in Cl. Crockett (ed.) Religion and Violence in a Secular World, pp. 137-156. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Derrida, J. (1995) On the Name. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derrida, J. (1995) On the Name. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Derrida, J. (2003) Voyous. Paris: Galilee.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derrida, J. (2003) Voyous. Paris: Galilee.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keller, C. (2015) Cloud of the Impossible. New York: Columbia University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keller, C. (2015) Cloud of the Impossible. New York: Columbia University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keller, C. (2005) God and Power: Counter-Apocalyptic Journeys. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keller, C. (2005) God and Power: Counter-Apocalyptic Journeys. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keller, C. (2003) The Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keller, C. (2003) The Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schneider, L. (2007) Beyond Monotheism: A Theology of Multiplicity. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schneider, L. (2007) Beyond Monotheism: A Theology of Multiplicity. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Whitehead, A.N. (1978) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: New Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Whitehead, A.N. (1978) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: New Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
