<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">religion</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2073-7203</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2073-7211</issn><publisher><publisher-name>РАНХиГС</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22394/2073-7203-2022-40-4-306-332</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">religion-167</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>VARIA</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>VARIA</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Эволюция представлений об обожении в богословском наследии И. В. Попова</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Evolution of the Ideas about Deification in St. John Popov’s Theological Legacy</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хондзинский</surname><given-names>П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khondzinskii</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Павел Хондзинский — протоиерей, доцент</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Pavel Khondzinskii — Archpriest, Associated Professor</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">paulum@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Православный Свято-Тихоновский гуманитарный университет<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University of the Humanities<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>306</fpage><lpage>332</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Хондзинский П., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Хондзинский П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Khondzinskii P.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://religion.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/167">https://religion.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/167</self-uri><abstract><p>Тема обожения (theosis) является одной из самых актуальных сегодня для православного богословия, причем не только в России. Достаточно упомянуть о готовящейся к выходу в 2023 г. The Oxford Handbook of Deification, чтобы подтвердить сказанное. Между тем, в истории русского богословия есть немало лакун, до сих пор по разным причинам не привлекавших внимание исследователей. Одна из них связана с именем выдающегося русского патролога начала ХХ в., И. В. Попова, который в своих статьях, посвященных проблеме обожения, первым в русском богословии дал ее концептуальное освещение. Причем, трижды возвращаясь к этой теме на разном материале, Попов не повторял себя, но вносил важные — иногда принципиальные — изменения в свою концепцию. В частности, только в последней из своих работ он сформулировал тезис о бытующих в древней Церкви двух формах обожения: «реалистической» и «идеалистической». Интерес представляет, однако, не только эта эволюция сама по себе, но и ее контекст, связанный с именами старших современников Попова: А. Гарнака и В. С. Соловьева. Проведенный в статье анализ показывает, что, не определяясь полностью ни одним из указанных выше влияний, Попов в конечном счете стремился встроить концепцию обожения в собственные представления об идеале христианской жизни.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The idea of deification (theosis) is one of the most relevant topics for the Orthodox theology today, and not only in Russia: “The Oxford Handbook of Deification” is forthcoming in 2023. However, there are numerous gaps in the history of Russian theology, which, for various reasons, have not drawn the attention of researchers. One of those gaps is related to the name of an outstanding early twentieth century Russian patrologist, Ivan Vasilievich Popov. He was the first in Russian theology to provide a conceptualization of this topic. While returning to this topic a few times in different contexts, Popov did not repeat himself but made substantial changes to his conception. In particular, in his last work he formulated the thesis on two forms of deification in the ancient Church: “realistic” and “idealistic”. Of much interest is also the context of his work, which is associated with the names of Popov’s elder contemporaries — Adolf von Harnack and Vladimir Solovyov. Without identifying himself entirely with other approaches, Popov ultimately tried to integrate the conception of deification into his own views on the ideal of Christian life.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>обожение</kwd><kwd>И. В. Попов</kwd><kwd>русское богословие</kwd><kwd>А. Гарнак</kwd><kwd>В. C. Соловьев</kwd><kwd>богочеловечество</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>deification</kwd><kwd>J.V. Popov</kwd><kwd>Russian theology</kwd><kwd>A. Harnack</kwd><kwd>V. Solovyov</kwd><kwd>godmanhood</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement>Статья подготовлена в рамках проекта «Русское духовно-академическое богословие конца XIX — начала XX вв.: идеи и контексты» при поддержке ПСТГУ и Фонда «Живая традиция».</funding-statement></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement>Article is prepared within the “Russian religious academic theology of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century: ideas and contexts” project with assistance of St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University and Fund “The live Tradition”.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Антоний (Храповицкий) митр. Полное собрание сочинений: В 3 т. Казань, 1900.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Антоний (Храповицкий) митр. Полное собрание сочинений: В 3 т. Казань, 1900.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаврюшин Н.К. Русское богословие. Очерки и портреты. Нижний Новгород, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Гаврюшин Н.К. Русское богословие. Очерки и портреты. Нижний Новгород, 2011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Голубцов С.А. Стратилаты академические. М., 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Голубцов С.А. Стратилаты академические. М., 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дионисий Ареопагит. Сочинения. СПб., 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Дионисий Ареопагит. Сочинения. СПб., 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лосский В. Н. Спор о Софии. М., 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лосский В. Н. Спор о Софии. М., 1996.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Оболевич Т. Мирра Лот-Бородина: историк, литератор, философ, богослов. СПб., 2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Оболевич Т. Мирра Лот-Бородина: историк, литератор, философ, богослов. СПб., 2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов И.В. Естественный нравственный закон. Сергиев Посад, 1897.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Попов И.В. Естественный нравственный закон. Сергиев Посад, 1897.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов И.В. Труды по патрологии. Т. 1. Сергиев Посад, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Попов И.В. Труды по патрологии. Т. 1. Сергиев Посад, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соловьев В.С. Россия и вселенская Церковь. М., 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Соловьев В.С. Россия и вселенская Церковь. М., 1991.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соловьев В.С. Собрание сочинений: В 10 т. СПб., 1912.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Соловьев В.С. Собрание сочинений: В 10 т. СПб., 1912.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Флоренский П. Столп и утверждение истины. М., 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Флоренский П. Столп и утверждение истины. М., 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Янышев И., протопр. Сущность христианства с нравственной точки зрения. СПб., 1877.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Янышев И., протопр. Сущность христианства с нравственной точки зрения. СПб., 1877.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Antonii (Khrapoviczkij) mitr. (1900) Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works], in 3 vol., Kazan`.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Antonii (Khrapoviczkij) mitr. (1900) Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works], in 3 vol., Kazan`.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coates, R. (2019) Deification in Russian Religious Thought. Between Revolution 1905–1917. Oxford.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coates, R. (2019) Deification in Russian Religious Thought. Between Revolution 1905–1917. Oxford.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Comte, A. (1967). Système de politique positive, Tome premier, Osnabruck.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Comte, A. (1967). Système de politique positive, Tome premier, Osnabruck.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dionisij Areopagit (2002) Sochineniia [Works]. Saint-Petersburg.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dionisij Areopagit (2002) Sochineniia [Works]. Saint-Petersburg.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Florenskii, P. (2003) Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny [Тhe Pillar and Affirmation of Truth]. Mosсow.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Florenskii, P. (2003) Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny [Тhe Pillar and Affirmation of Truth]. Mosсow.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gavryushin, N.K. (2011) Russkoe bogoslovie. Ocherki i portrety [Russian Theology. Essays and Portraits]. Nizhnii Novgorod.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gavryushin, N.K. (2011) Russkoe bogoslovie. Ocherki i portrety [Russian Theology. Essays and Portraits]. Nizhnii Novgorod.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Golubtsov, S. (1999) Stratilaty akademicheskie [Warriors of the Academy]. Mosсow.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golubtsov, S. (1999) Stratilaty akademicheskie [Warriors of the Academy]. Mosсow.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gross, J. (1938) La Divinisation du chrétien d’après les Pères grecs. Contribution historique à la doctrine de grâce. Paris.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gross, J. (1938) La Divinisation du chrétien d’après les Pères grecs. Contribution historique à la doctrine de grâce. Paris.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harnack, A. (1893) Dogmengeschichte. Freiburg und Leipzig.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harnack, A. (1893) Dogmengeschichte. Freiburg und Leipzig.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keating, D. (2015) “Typologies of Deification”, International Journal of Systematic Theology 17(3): 267–283.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keating, D. (2015) “Typologies of Deification”, International Journal of Systematic Theology 17(3): 267–283.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Losskii, V.N. (1996) Spor o Sofii [The dispute about Sofia]. Mosсow.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Losskii, V.N. (1996) Spor o Sofii [The dispute about Sofia]. Mosсow.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Obolevich, T. (2020) Mirra LotBorodina: istorik, literator, filosof, bogoslov [Mirra LotBorodina: Historian, Writer, Philosopher, Theologian]. Saint-Petersburg.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Obolevich, T. (2020) Mirra LotBorodina: istorik, literator, filosof, bogoslov [Mirra LotBorodina: Historian, Writer, Philosopher, Theologian]. Saint-Petersburg.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pilch, J. (2018) ‘Breathing the spirit with both lungs’: Deification in the Work of Vladimir Solov’ev. Leuven — Paris — Bristol.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pilch, J. (2018) ‘Breathing the spirit with both lungs’: Deification in the Work of Vladimir Solov’ev. Leuven — Paris — Bristol.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov, I.V. (1897) Estestvennyj nravstvennyi zakon [The Natural Moral Law]. Sergiev Posad.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov, I.V. (1897) Estestvennyj nravstvennyi zakon [The Natural Moral Law]. Sergiev Posad.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov, I.V. (2004) Trudy po patrologii [Works on Patrology]. T. 1, Sergiev Posad, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov, I.V. (2004) Trudy po patrologii [Works on Patrology]. T. 1, Sergiev Posad, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Russell, N. (2004) The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Russell, N. (2004) The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solov’ev V. S. (1912) Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]. V 10 t., Saint-Petersburg.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solov’ev V. S. (1912) Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]. V 10 t., Saint-Petersburg.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solov’ev V. S. (1991) Rossiia i Vselenskaia Tserkov’ [Russia and the Universal Church]. Mosсow.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solov’ev V. S. (1991) Rossiia i Vselenskaia Tserkov’ [Russia and the Universal Church]. Mosсow.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yany`shev I., protopr. (1877) Sushnost’ khristianstva s nravstvennoi tochki zreniia [The essence of Christianity from a moral point of view]. Saint-Petersburg.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yany`shev I., protopr. (1877) Sushnost’ khristianstva s nravstvennoi tochki zreniia [The essence of Christianity from a moral point of view]. Saint-Petersburg.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
