Piety, Authority and “Popular Ijtihad” in the Online Space of Russian Muslims during the Pandemic
ru
Original Article
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
Sofya Ragozina (Research Fellow)
Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences
Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
This article examines the first reactions of the Russian Muslim community in the social networks to the spread of the coronavirus (mostly February-May 2020). We turn to the concepts of authority and legitimacy; the ideas of Brian Turner on the performative role of information technology for the institution of religious authority; Gary Bunt’s discussion of the democratization of Islamic knowledge in the online environment; Olivier Roy’s concept of individualization of Islam; and Peter Mandaville’s idea of decentralization of power in the Islamic tradition. This study seeks to answer two interrelated questions: who and how reinterprets the category of Islamic piety in the context of the pandemic and to what extent the online environment transforms the Islamic tradition as a whole. Based on textual analysis of individual publications on social networks and interviews with editors of public websites, the common narratives of Russian Muslim discourse on the pandemic were identified as follows: a retaliation against China for the oppression of Muslim Uighurs; the search for the signs of the coming doomsday; various approaches to the reinterpretation of religious piety. We suggest the term “popular” or “spontaneous” ijtihad to describe the variety of individualized strategies stimulated by the crisis. The construction of these strategies would not have been possible without the virtual environment, characterized by the polyarchic community of “online ulema” and the digitalization of religious practices.
Keywords: Islam in Russia, coronavirus, sociology of Islam, religious authority, ijtihad, ислам в России, коронавирус, социология ислама, религиозный авторитет, иджтихад
Вебер М. Политика как призвание и профессия. М.: Рипол-классик, 2018.
Сюкияйнен Л.Р. Мусульманское право. Вопросы теории и практики. М.: "Наука", 1986.
Хьярвард С. Три формы медиатизированной религии: изменение облика религии в публичном пространстве // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2020. № 38(2). С. 41-75.
Asad, T. (2018) Secular Translations: Nation-State, Modern Self, and Calculative Reason. New York: Columbia University Press.
Becker, C. (2011) "Muslims On the Path of the Salafal-Salih", Information, Communication & Society 14(8): 1181-1203.
Bunt, G.R. (2018) Hashtag Islam. How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Hjarvard, S. (2020) "Three Forms of Mediatized Religion: Changing the Public Face of Religion", Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom 38(2): 41-75.
Mandaville, P. (2007) "Globalization and the Politics of Religious Knowledge. Pluralizing Authority in the Muslim World", Theory, Culture and Society 24(2): 101-115.
Peter, F. (2006) "Individualization and religious authority in Western European Islam", Islam and Christian&Muslim Relations 17(1): 105-118.
Roy, O. (204) "Globalized Islam - Interview with Olivier Roy", Religioscope, 8 November [https://english.religion.info/2004/11/08/globalized-islam-interview-with-olivier-roy/, accessed on 10.01.2021].
Syukiiainen, L.R. (1986) Musul'manskoe pravo. Voprosy teorii ipraktiki [Muslim law. Theory and Practice]. M.: "Nauka".
Turner, B.S. (2013) The Sociology of Islam: Collected Essays of Bryan S. Turner. Ashgate Publishing Company.
Weber, M. (2018) Politika kak prizvanie i professia [Politics as a Vocation]. M.: Ripolklassik.
Times citedRecent citationsField Citation RatioRelative Citation Ratio
© Article. Sofya Ragozina, 2021.