2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
Debates about Innate Religiosity in the Cognitive Science of Religion
ru
Original Article
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
Tatiana Malevich (Research Fellow, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences)
Denis Kozhevnikov (Research Fellow, Center for Psychology of Religion, St. Tikhon's Orthodox University)
This paper gives an overview of the current debate in the cognitive theories of religion over the relative role of social and cultural versus biological and cognitive factors in the development and formation of religious beliefs. One of the key elements of this debate is the so-called Born Believers thesis. Here we identify and analyze in detail its underlying assumptions, major components, and argumentation. We also show limitations and weak empirical validity of the alternative to Born Believers thesis hypothesis - treating religion as the result solely of religious socialization and enculturation. Furthermore, we identify the place of the Born Believers thesis in the context of the wider “innateness” debate in cognitive sciences. This thesis satisfies the minimum condition of “innateness” and may serve as a useful heuristic tool in cross-cultural research and in studies of children's religiosity. At the same time, we demonstrate how the Born Believers thesis reveals the limitations of the cognitive approach to the study of religion in solving the problem of “innateness” of religious beliefs.
Keywords: cognitive science of religion, cognitive sciences, nativism, innateness, modularity, religion, religiousness, anthropomorphism, когнитивное религиоведение, когнитивные науки, нативизм, религия, религиозность, антропоморфизм, врожденность, модульный подход
Докинз Р. Бог как иллюзия. М.: КоЛибри, 2010.
Малевич Т.В. Нейротеология: теории религии и наука о мозге//Религиоведческие исследования. 2012. № 1-2. С. 62-83.
Малевич Т.В., Фолиева ТА. «Естественность» религии и «естественная религия» в когнитивном религиоведении//Философия и культура. 2014. Т. 11(83). С. 1605-1617.
Михельсон О. Подходы к изучению религии в современной эволюционной психологии//Государство, религия и церковь в России и за рубежом. 2013. Т. 3(31). С. 63-76.
Пиаже Ж. Моральное суждение у ребенка. М.: Академический проект, 2006.
Сергиенко Р.А. Когнитивный подход к объяснению природы религии и религиозных представлений // Вестник КГПУ им. В.П. Астафьева. 2011. Т. 3(17). С. 36-43.
Шахнович М. Когнитивная наука и исследования религии // Государство, религия и церковь в России и за рубежом. 2013. Т. 3(31). С. 32-62.
Atran, S. (2002) In God We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, J.L. (2012) Born Believers: The Science of Children's Religious Belief. N.Y.: Simon and Schuster.
Barrett, J.L. (2011) “Cognitive Science of Religion: Looking Back, Looking Forward”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50(2): 229-239.
Barrett, J.L. (2000) “Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion”, Trends in Cognitive Science 4(1): 29-34.
Barrett, J.L. (2008) “Why Santa Claus Is not a God”, Journal of Cognition and Culture 8(1-2): 149-161.
Barrett, J.L., Richert, R.A. (2003) “Anthropomorphism or Preparedness? Exploring Children's God Concepts”, Review of Religious Research 44: 300-312.
Bering, J.M. (2011) The Belief Instinct: The Psychology of Souls, Destiny, and the Meaning of Life. N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Company.
Bering, J.M. (2006) “The Folk Psychology of Souls”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29: 453-498.
Bering, J.M. (2002) “Intuitive Conceptions of Dead Agents' Minds: The Natural Foundations of Afterlife Beliefs as Phenomenological Boundary”, Journal of Cognition and Culture 2(4): 263-308.
Bloom, P. (2004) Descartes' Baby: How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human. N.Y.: Basic Books.
Boyd, R. (1991) “Realism, Antifoundationalism, and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds”, Philosophical Studies 61(1): 127-148.
Boyer, P. (1994) The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boyer, P. (2002) “Religious Ontologies and the Bounds of Sense: A Cognitive Catalogue of the Supernatural”, in Philosophy in Wartime: A Collection of Readings prepared in conjunction with the Seminar: Religion, Revolution, Terrorism and War (University at Buffalo Spring Semester 2002) .
Boyer, P. (2003) “Religious Thought and Behaviour as Byproducts of Brain Function”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(3): 119-124.
Boyer, P. (1996) “What Makes Anthropomorphism Natural: Intuitive Ontology and Cultural Representations”, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2(1): 83-97.
Boyer, P., Barrett, H.C. (2005) “Domain Specificity and Intuitive Ontology”, in D.M. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons.
Casler, K., Kelemen, D. (2008) “Developmental Continuity in Teleo-Functional Explanation: Reasoning about Nature among Romanian Romani Adults”, Journal of Cognition and Development 9(3): 340-363.
Chiao, J.Y., Immordino-Yang, M.H. (2013) “Modularity and the Cultural Mind: Contributions of Cultural Neuroscience to Cognitive Theory”, Perspectives on Psychological Science 8(1): 56-61.
Cohen, E., Barrett, J.L. (2008) “Conceptualizing Spirit Possession: Ethnographic and Experimental Evidence”, Ethos 26(2): 246-267.
Corriveau, K.H., Chen, E.E., Harris, P.L. (2015) “Judgments about Fact and Fiction by Children from Religious and Nonreligious Backgrounds”, Cognitive Science 39(2): 353-382.
Dokinz, R. (2010) Bog kak illiuziia . M.: KoLibri.
Evans, E.M. (2001) “Cognitive and Contextual Factors in the Emergence of Diverse Belief Systems: Creation versus Evolution”, Cognitive Psychology 42: 217-266.
Flack, J., de Waal, F. (2002) “‘Any Animal Whatever': Darwinian Building Blocks of Morality in Monkeys and Apes”, in L.D. Katz (ed.) Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives, pp. 1-30. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
Gervais, W.M., Henrich, J. (2010) “The Zeus Problem: Why Representational Content Biases Cannot Explain Faith in Gods”, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3): 383-389.
Grayling, A.C. (2007) Against All Gods: Six Polemics on Religion and an Essay on Kindness. London: Oberon Books.
Griffiths, P.E. (2002) “What Is Innateness?”, The Monist 85(1): 70-85.
Guthrie, S.E. (2002) “Animal Animism: Evolutionary Roots of Religious Cognition”, in I. Pyysiäinen and V. Anttonen (eds) Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion, pp. 38-67. London: Continuum.
Guthrie, S.E. (1993) Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Hamer, D. (2005). The God Gene: How Faith Is Hardwired into Our Genes. N.Y.: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Hirschfeld, L.A., Gelman, S.A. (1994) “Toward a Topography of Mind: An Introduction to Domain Specificity”, in L.A. Hirschfeld and S.A. Gelman (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, pp. 3-35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodge, K.M. (2012) “Context Sensitivity and the Folk Psychology of Souls: Why Bering et. al. Got the Findings They Did”, in D. Evers, M. Fuller, A. Jackelén, and T. Smedes (eds.) Is Religion Natural? pp. 49-63. New York: T & T Clark International.
James, W. (1892) “Thought before Language: A Deaf-Mute's Recollections”, The Philosophical Review 1: 613-624.
Keil, F.C. (1979) Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective. Cambridge.
Kelemen, D., DiYanni, C. (2005) “Intuitions about Origins: Purpose and Intelligent Design in Children's Reasoning about Nature”, Journal of Cognition and Development 6(1): 3-31.
Linquist, S., Machery, E., Griffiths, P.E., Stotz, K. (2011) “Exploring the Folkbiological Conception of Human Nature”, Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 366: 444-453.
Malevich, T.V. (2012) “Neiroteologiia: teorii religii i nauka o mozge” , Religiovedcheskie issledovaniia 1-2: 62
Malevich, T.V., Folieva, T.A. (2014) “‘Estestvennost' religii i ‘estestvennaia religiia' v kognitivnom religiovedenii” , Filosofiia i kul'tura 11(83): 1605-1617.
Mameli, M. and Bateson, P. (2011) “An Evaluation of the Concept of Innateness”, Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 366: 436-443.
McCauley, R.N. (2011) Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mikhel'son, O. (2013) “Podkhody k izucheniiu religii v sovremennoi evoliutsionnoi psikhologii” , Gosudarstvo, religiia i Tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom 3(31): 63-76.
Newberg, A., Waldman, M.R. (2007) Born to Believe: God, Science, and the Origin of Ordinary and Extraordinary Beliefs. N.Y.: Free Press.
Petrovich, O. (1997) “Understanding of Non-Natural Causality in Children and Adults: A Case against Artificialism”, Psyche en Geloof 8: 151-165.
Piaget, J. (2001) Child's Conception of the World. London: Routledge.
Powell, R., Clarke, S. (2012) “Religion as an Evolutionary Byproduct: A Critique of the Standard”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63(3): 457-486.
Prinz, J.J. (2006) “Is the Mind Really Modular?”, in R.J. Stainton (ed.) Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, pp. 22-36. Malden: Blackwell.
Pyysiäinen, I. (2003) How Religion Works: Towards a New Cognitive Science of Religion. Leiden: Brill.
Pyysiäinen, I. (2003) “On the ‘Innateness' of Religion: A Comment on Bering”, Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(3): 218-225.
Sampson, G. (2005) The ‘Language Instinct Debate. London: A&C Black.
Samuels, R. (2002) “Nativism in Cognitive Science”, Mind & Language 17(3): 233-265.
Schloss, J.P. (2014) “Darwinian Explanations of Morality: Accounting for the Normal but not the Normative”, in H. Putnam, S. Neiman, J.P. Schloss (eds) Understanding Moral Sentiments: Darwinian Perspectives? pp. 81-121. Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Sergienko, R.A. (2011) “Kognitivnyi podkhod k ob”iasneniiu prirody religii i religioznykh predstavlenii” , Vestnik KGPU im. V.P. Astaf'eva 3(17): 36-43.
Shakhnovich, M. (2013) “Kognitivnaia nauka i issledovaniia religii” , Gosudarstvo, religiia i Tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom 3(31): 32-62.
Sperber, D. (1996) Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Waxman, S., Medin, D., Ross, N. (2007) “Folkbiological Reasoning from a Cross-Cultural Developmental Perspective: Early Essentialist Notions Are Shaped by Cultural Beliefs”, Developmental Psychology 43(2): 294-308.
Wigger, J.B., Paxson, K., Ryan, L. (2013) “What Do Invisible Friends Know? Imaginary Companions, Theory of Mind, and God”, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 23(1): 2-14.
© Article. Tatiana Malevich, Denis Kozhevnikov, 2016.